Acevedo v. JP Morgan Chase et al

Filing 6

ORDER FOR INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER. The Court finds that this action was improperly assigned to this division and that it should be transferred to San Francisco or Oakland division. The Clerk shall transfer this case immediately. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/17/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009) Modified text on 12/18/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Antonio Acevedo, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 09-04761 JW ORDER FOR INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JP Morgan Chase, et al., Defendants. / Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-2(g), the Court finds that this action was improperly assigned to this division and that it should be transferred to San Francisco or Oakland division under Civil Local Rule 3-2(d). The Court notes that Plaintiff filed an identical action on October 6, 2009 which was assigned to Judge Seeborg. See Acevedo v. JP Morgan Chase, et al., CV 09-04765. On October 7, 2009, Judge Seeborg issued an order for intra-district transfer and that action is now before Judge White. (Id. at Docket Item No. 4; Docket Item No. 7.). Thus, although it appears that this action is identical to CV 09-04765 and can be dismissed on that basis, the Court leaves for the judge on reassignment to make the appropriate decision. The Clerk shall transfer this case immediately. Dated: December 17, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Sharon Lynn Lapin lapinlaws@juno.com Dated: December 17, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?