Acevedo v. JP Morgan Chase et al

Filing 31

ORDER re: opposition to pending motion. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 02/04/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JP MORGAN CHASE, ET AL., Defendants. / This matter was set for a hearing on February 5, 2010 on Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. On December 21, 2009, the Court issued an order requiring that an opposition to the motion be filed by no later than January 6, 2010. On January 20, 2010, the Court received Defendants' reply indicating that, pursuant to the Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's opposition was due on January 15, 2010. Plaintiff has filed no opposition. Accordingly, on January 27, 2010, this Court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On February 3, 2010, this Court received a response to the order to show cause indicating that the failure to file an opposition was due to counsel's oversight. However, the Court has still not received an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. If an opposition is not filed by February 8, 2010, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER RE OPPOSITION TO PENDING MOTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTONIO ACEVEDO, Plaintiff, No. C 09-04765 JSW

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28