Brenton v. Copenhaver et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/3/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. PAUL COPENHAVER, Warden, Respondent. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHERYL BRENTON, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C 09-4766 JSW (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Docket No. 2)
Petitioner, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Dublin, California, filed this pro se habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. She argues that officials at the prison have failed to individually consider her for release to a Community Corrections Center ("CCC") and for home confinement in violation of her constitutional rights. She has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis which is now DENIED as Petitioner has more than ample funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee (docket no. 2). Section 2241 does not specifically require petitioners to exhaust available remedies before filing petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. Castro-Cortez v. INS, 239 F3d 1037, 1047 (9th Cir. 2001). Nonetheless, the Ninth Circuit requires "as a prudential matter, that habeas petitioners exhaust available judicial and administrative remedies before seeking relief under § 2241." Id. (citations omitted). The requirement may be waived in limited circumstances because it is not a jurisdictional prerequisite. Id.; see, e.g., Laing v. Ashcroft, 370 F.3d 994, 1000-01 (9th Cir. 2004) (listing circumstances when waiver of exhaustion requirement may be appropriate). Petitioner claims that the exhaustion requirement should be waived in her case. She argues
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
that exhausting her claim through the BOP's administrative appeals process would be futile. (Petition at 3.) She argues that the BOP issues a form letter stating that the individual has been considered and denied based on individual needs while "staff" tell prisoners that they are being categorically denied. Petitioner mentions a "town hall" meeting at the prison in 2009 but does not identify the identity of the person or the statements that were made. Generalized statements by unidentified staff members who may or may not be authorized to speak to the issue do not show a sufficient justification for her to skip the administrative appeal process. The actual BOP decision makers should decide her case before this Court does. Petitioner also argues that exhaustion is futile because the deputy director who will review the warden's decision is married to him. However, the regulations provide for the regional director, and then the general counsel, to review the warden's decision, and do not provide for the deputy director to play a role in the review process. See 28 C.F.R. § 542.15. It is far from clear that Petitioner's pursuit of administrative remedies would be futile. Waiver of the exhaustion requirement is not warranted under these circumstances. CONCLUSION In light of the foregoing, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after exhausting the BOP's administrative appeals process. The Clerk shall close the file and enter judgment in accordance with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 3, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CHERYL BRENTON, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV09-04766 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
PAUL COPENHAVER et al, Defendant. /
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 3, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Cheryl Brenton 41437-048 5675 8th Street Camp Parks Dublin, CA 94568 Dated: May 3, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?