Haskell et al v. Brown et al

Filing 139

ORDER granting 138 STIPULATION Re: Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Jeffrey Patrick Lyons, Jr., Aakash Desai, Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Reginald Ento. Case Management Statement due by 5/9/2014. Case Management Conference reset for 5/16/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/24/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PETER C. MEIER (SB# 179019) [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MICHAEL T. RISHER (SB# 191627) [e-mail]
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL, REGINALD ENTO,
JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, JR., and AAKASH DESAI,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated

11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18
19

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL,
REGINALD ENTO, JEFFREY PATRICK
LYONS, JR., and AAKASH DESAI, on
behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated,

20
21
22
23

Plaintiffs,
vs.
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
of California; EVA STEINBERGER,
Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs,
California Department of Justice,

24
Defendants.
25

Civil Case No. C 09-4779 CRB
CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Date: February 7, 2014
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Complaint Filed: October 7, 2009
First Am. Complaint Filed: December 1, 2009

26
27
28
CASE NO. C 09-4779 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONTINUANCE OF CMC

Plaintiffs Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Reginald Ento, Jeffrey Patrick Lyons, Jr., and
1

Aakash Desai, and Defendants Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, and Eva

2

Steinberger, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice, by and

3

through their counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, the parties have a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently
scheduled for February 7, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.;

6
7

WHEREAS, on September 19, 2012, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit reheard
the pending appeal of this Court’s order;

8
9

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2012, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in
another case addressing whether the Fourth Amendment allows the states to collect and analyze

10

DNA from people arrested and charged with serious offenses, King v. Maryland, 42 A.3d 549

11

(Md. 2012), cert. granted, 81 U.S.L.W. 3127 (U.S. Nov. 9, 2012), and held argument on February

12

26, 2013;

13
14

WHEREAS, on November 13, 2012, the Ninth Circuit deferred submission of this
case pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. King;

15
16

WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Maryland
v. King, 133 S. Ct. 1236 (2013);

17

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2013, the Ninth Circuit ordered the parties to submit

18

supplemental briefs on the application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. King;

19
20

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2013, an en banc court heard the argument of the
parties on their supplemental briefs;

21
22

WHEREAS, the parties’ supplemental briefs are currently under consideration
before the en banc panel;

23
24

WHEREAS, by agreement of the parties, counsel request a continuance of
approximately 99 days;

25

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel,

26

///

27

///

28
CASE NO. C 09-4779 CRB

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONTINUANCE OF CMC

hereby stipulate and agree that the February 7, 2014 CMC shall be continued, and that a CMC
1

shall be held on May 16, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. Should an earlier date become necessary or

2

appropriate by any further action of the Ninth Circuit, the parties will contact the Court.

3
4
5

DATED: January 23, 2014

6

By:

7

/s/ Peter C. Meier
Peter C. Meier

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL, REGINALD ENTO,
JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, JR., and AAKASH DESAI,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated

8
9
10

PAUL HASTINGS LLP

DATED: January 23, 2014

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:

/s/ Enid A. Camps
Enid A. Camps
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California and
EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA
Programs, California Department of Justice

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Enid
A. Camps, attorney for defendants Kamala D. Harris and Eva Steinberger.

18
19

DATED: January 23, 2014

20

PAUL HASTINGS LLP
By:

/s/ Peter C. Meier
Peter C. Meier

21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL, REGINALD ENTO,
JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, JR., and AAKASH DESAI,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. C 09-4779 CRB

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONTINUANCE OF CMC

ORDER
1
2

The Court has considered the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing

3

therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: The February 7, 2014 Case Management

4

Conference shall be continued, and a Case Management Conference shall be held on May 16,

5

2014 at 8:30 a.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
DATED: Janaury 24, 2014

UNIT
ED

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

11

RT

13

ORD

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

12

O
IT IS S

J

ER

H

14
15

FO

10

R NIA

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ERED

LI

8

A

6

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. C 09-4779 CRB

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONTINUANCE OF CMC