Haskell et al v. Brown et al

Filing 40

ORDER re 37 Stipulation filed by Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Reginald Ento, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 37 Stipulation. Responsive pleading or Motions due by 11/23/2009. Responses due by 12/14/2009. Replies due by 12/21/2009. Motion Hearing set for 1/15/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/18/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009) Modified on 11/19/2009 (mcl, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PETER C. MEIER (SB# 179019) [e-mail] ERIC A. LONG (SB# 244147) [e-mail] KATHARINE CHAO (SB# 247571) [e-mail] SARAH O. CHANG (SB# 257921) [e-mail] PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twent y-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] MICHAEL T. RISHER (SB# 191627) [e-mail] AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL and REGINALD ENTO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL and REGINALD ENTO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaint iffs, vs. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Attorney General of California; EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Just ice; and MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff, San Francisco County, Defendants.

Civil Case No. 09-4779 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT HENNESSEY EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CLASS ACTION

CASE NO. CV 09-4779 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME - PLS./HENNESSEY

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to the Stipulation, and for good cause shown, of Plaint iffs Elizabeth Aida Haskell and Reginald Ento, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (Plaintiffs), and Defendant Michael Hennessey, Sheriff for the County of San Francisco (Defendant Hennessey), by and through their counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Hennessey shall have until November 23, 2009 to file a responsive pleading or Motion to Dismiss in this case. 2. If Defendant Hennessey files a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Plaintiffs shall have until December 14, 2009 to file an Opposition to such motion. Defendant Hennessey shall have until December 21, 2009 to file a Reply in support of any such motion. 15 3. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will take place on January 8, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________, 2009 November 18

UNIT ED

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE RED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

LEGAL_US_W # 63067650.1

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

CASE NO. CV 09-4779 CRB

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME - PLS./HENNESSEY

A

C

LI

FO

J

arles R udge Ch

. Breyer

R NIA

O IT IS S

ORDE

NO

RT

H