Haskell et al v. Brown et al

Filing 9

ORDER re 7 Stipulation filed by Eva Steinberger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 7 Stipulation. Responisve Pleading or Motion due by 11/23/2009.Responses due by 12/14/2009. Replies due by 12/21/2009. Motion Hearing set for 1/8/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/29/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California CONSTANCE L. LELOUIS Supervising Deputy Attorney General DANIEL J. POWELL Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 230304 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of California, and Eva Steinberger, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL and REGINALD ENTO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,

09-cv-04779-CRB

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE Plaintiffs, PLEADING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor Judge: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer Action Filed: October 7, 2009

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Attorney General of California; EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice; and MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff, San Francisco County, Defendants.

1 [Proposed] Order Extending Time (09-cv-04779-CRB)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to the Stipulation between Plaintiffs Elizabeth Aida Haskell and Reginald Ento, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (Plaintiffs); and Defendants Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of California and Eva Steinberger, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice (State Defendants), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. State Defendants shall have until November 23, 2009 to file a responsive pleading or Motion to Dismiss in this case. 2. If the State Defendants file a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Plaintiffs shall have until December 14, 2009 to file an Opposition to such motion. State Defendants shall have until December 21, 2009 to file a Reply in support of any such motion. 3. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will take place on January 8, 2010.

UNIT ED

Hon. Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge ED

S

Dated: October 29, 2009

S DISTRICT TE C TA __________________________________

RT U O

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

2 [Proposed] Order Extending Time (09-cv-04779-CRB)

A

C

LI

FO

SA2009102748 20230828.doc

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ER

NO

RT

H