Park Village Apartments Tenants Association et al v. Mortimer Howard Trust et al
Filing
101
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference reset for 10/12/2012 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/3/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BAY AREA LEGAL AID
LISA GREIF, State Bar No. 214537
NAOMI YOUNG, State Bar No. 105041
ROBERT P. CAPISTRANO, State Bar No. 70382
1735 Telegraph Avenue
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: 510-663-4744
Facsimile: 510-663-4740
Email: lgreif@baylegal.org
nyoung@baylegal.org
bcapistrano@baylegal.org
NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT
JAMES R. GROW, State Bar No. 83548
KENT QIAN, State Bar No. 264944
703 Market St. Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: 415-546-7000
Facsimile: 415-546-7007
Email: jgrow@nhlp.org
kqian@nhlp.org
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS
ASSOCIATION, FOSTER, et al.
E-FILED
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS
TENANTS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM
FOSTER, SHIRLEY SMITH, ANAHID
ISSAHAKIAN, PATRICIA JOHNSON,
MARTIN KOCH, LAWRENCE LEE,
FOSTER REUBEN, MARIA LILLIAN
SANCHEZ, ALISON WRIGHT and
CORNELIUS WEEKLEY,
Case No. C-09-4780 EDL
JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
24
Plaintiffs,
25
v.
26
MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST,
MORTIMER R. HOWARD,
27
28
Defendants.
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Plaintiffs, PARK VILLAGE APARTMENT TENANTS ASSOCIATION, et al. (Plaintiffs)
and Defendants, MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST and MORTIMER HOWARD (Defendants), in
the above-entitled action, by and through respective counsel, hereby request that the August 7,
2012 settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Beeler, be continued to a date to be determined
by the Court’s availability. In an effort to assist the Court and allow sufficient time to come to a
final resolution on the remaining issues in the case, the parties would prefer to have the settlement
conference reset to a date in September 2012, if possible.
8
The reasons for this continuance request include:
9
1.
10
The parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions and significant progress
11
has been made toward a final stipulated agreement to make the preliminary injunction upheld by
12
the Ninth Circuit on February 24, 2011 permanent.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2.
This agreement will be a resolution of all issues and will include a dismissal of the
3.
In order to facilitate the settlement negotiations Defendants have propounded some
case.
discovery on Plaintiffs which is currently due after the currently scheduled settlement conference
on August 7, 2012. Since responses to the special interrogatories and request for production may
resolve some of the remaining issues, the parties feel that it would be more productive at this time
to continue settlement negotiations between themselves with the goal of a final resolution.
20
21
Having met and conferred, the parties agree that the following dates are acceptable to them:
22
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
23
Monday, September 24, 2012
24
Thursday, September 27, 2012
25
26
27
Additionally, Defendants also request that the deadline for filing the answer also be
extended to the day before the reset settlement conference date.
28
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-1
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
BAY AREA LEGAL AID
Lisa S. Greif
Naomi Young
Robert Capistrano
2
3
4
NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT
James R. Grow
Kent Qian
5
6
Dated: August 1, 2012
7
8
/s/ Lisa S. Greif
Lisa S. Greif
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
SWIHART AND ASSOCIATES
Thomas M. Swihart
11
12
Dated: August 1, 2012
13
/s/ Thomas M. Swihart
Thomas M. Swihart
Attorney for Defendants
14
15
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
16 "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.
17
18 Dated: August 1, 2012
19
20
By: /s/ Lisa S. Greif
LISA S. GREIF
Attorney for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-2
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
The Court having read and considered the Parties’ request to continue the settlement
conference and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the request is granted.
6
October 12, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.
The settlement conference will be reschedule to ___________________________ and
7
October 11, 2012
Defendants’ answer will be due on ____________________________.
8
9
The Settlement Conference Order issued on January 24, 2012, ECF Number 84
remains in affect.
10
11
August 3, 2012
DATED:_______________
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-3
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?