Park Village Apartments Tenants Association et al v. Mortimer Howard Trust et al
Filing
70
ORDER re 53 MOTION to Stay. Signed by Judge Laporte on 4/14/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BAY AREA LEGAL AID LISA GREIF, State Bar No. 214537 NAOMI YOUNG, State Bar No. 105041 ROBERT P. CAPISTRANO, State Bar No. 70382 1735 Telegraph Avenue Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-663-4744 Facsimile: 510-663-4740 Email: lgreif@baylegal.org nyoung@baylegal.org bcapistrano@baylegal.org NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT JAMES R. GROW, State Bar No. 83548 KENT QIAN, State Bar No. 264944 614 Grand Avenue, Suite 320 Oakland, California 94610 Telephone: 510-251-9400 Facsimile: 510-451-2300 Email: jgrow@nhlp.org kqian@nhlp.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS ASSOCIATION, FOSTER, et al. E-FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM FOSTER, SHIRLEY SMITH, FRED ALLEN, ANAHID ISSAHAKIAN, PATRICIA JOHNSON, MARTIN KOCH, LAWRENCE LEE, FOSTER REUBEN, MARIA LILLIAN SANCHEZ, CHRISTINE THOMAS, ALISON WRIGHT and CORNELIUS WEEKLEY, Plaintiffs, v. MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST, MORTIMER R. HOWARD, Defendants. Case No. C-09-4780 EDL ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION TO STAY AND MODIFICATION OF ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [AS MODIFIED]
[Proposed] Order on Defendants' Application To Stay and Modification of Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction Case No. C-09-4780 EDL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendants' Application for Stay came on for hearing before this Court on March 23, 2010, Lisa S. Greif, Bay Area Legal Aid, and Kent Qian, National Housing Law Project, appearing for Plaintiffs, and Andrea A. Brott appearing for Defendants. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Application to Stay Part C of the Preliminary Injunction Order Pending Appeal is DENIED. WHEREAS, the parties to this action, by and through their counsel in this action, met and conferred by telephone and email to modify Part C the Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The parties further agree that the Order Granting Plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 48) is incorporated by reference here and remains unchanged except for the modification below; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is MODIFIED as follows: Defendants Mortimer Howard Trust and Mortimer Howard (collectively "Defendant"), their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys and those in active concert or participation with you or them, ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO: A. Refrain from demanding or collecting any amounts from any tenant at Park Village
Apartments in excess of the amount that that tenant was paying as of September 1, 2009, unless the increase is covered by the housing assistance payments from the Oakland Housing Authority or is the result of a recertification under the voucher program; B. Refrain from evicting any tenant at Park Village Apartments or taking any action to
accomplish such an eviction, including the filing of any action for unlawful detainer, based upon nonpayment of any rental amount that exceeds the tenant's rent contribution as of September 1, 2009, unless the increase results from a recertification under the voucher program; C. On behalf of each Plaintiff, Defendant, as mandated by federal law, shall take all
steps necessary to enter into and execute housing assistance payments contracts with the Oakland Housing Authority for the acceptance of tenant based vouchers, provided that: 1) neither the fact of Defendant's execution of the such contracts or of any other documents or agreements required
1 [Proposed] Order on Defendants' Application To Stay and Modification of Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction Case No. C-09-4780 EDL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
for execution of the housing assistance payments contracts, nor the existence of any particular provision in such a contract or agreement, nor Defendant's acquiescence to take the necessary steps to enter into such contracts or agreements, shall be construed as a waiver of any of Defendant's rights, including but not limited to, the right to contest whether entering into such agreements or taking such steps necessary to enter into the such contracts, is "mandated by federal law" and 2) any such contracts, documents and steps shall be without further effect if so specified by an appellate court or by this Court on final judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall take all reasonable measures to ensure that the following steps are completed by the dates specified to fully comply with this order and execute the housing assistance payments contracts with the Oakland Housing Authority for the acceptance of tenant based vouchers: 1. Defendant to sign a Request for Tenancy Approval for each Plaintiff's unit: April 30, 2010 2. Initial unit inspections completed by Oakland Housing Authority: May 7, 2010 3. Repairs to units completed by Defendant: 4. Reasonable rent determination by Oakland Housing Authority: 5. Final inspections to units by Oakland Housing Authority: May 28, 2010 June 4, 2010 June 4, 2010
6. Execution of new leases and Tenancy Addenda with Plaintiffs and HAP contracts and additional documents with Oakland Housing Authority: June 11, 2010
If any step is not completed on the date specified through no fault of Defendants (e.g., because of a delay on the part of the Oakland Housing Authority over which Defendants have no control), the remainder of the timeline shall be extended accordingly.
DATED: April 14, 2010
________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2 [Proposed] Order on Defendants' Application To Stay and Modification of Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction Case No. C-09-4780 EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?