Park Village Apartments Tenants Association et al v. Mortimer Howard Trust et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference reset to 8/7/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. The settlement conference set for June 22, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/18/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BAY AREA LEGAL AID
LISA GREIF, State Bar No. 214537
NAOMI YOUNG, State Bar No. 105041
ROBERT P. CAPISTRANO, State Bar No. 70382
1735 Telegraph Avenue
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: 510-663-4744
Facsimile: 510-663-4740
Email: lgreif@baylegal.org
nyoung@baylegal.org
bcapistrano@baylegal.org
NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT
JAMES R. GROW, State Bar No. 83548
KENT QIAN, State Bar No. 264944
703 Market St. Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: 415-546-7000
Facsimile: 415-546-7007
Email: jgrow@nhlp.org
kqian@nhlp.org
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS
ASSOCIATION, FOSTER, et al.
E-FILED
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS
TENANTS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM
FOSTER, SHIRLEY SMITH, ANAHID
ISSAHAKIAN, PATRICIA JOHNSON,
MARTIN KOCH, LAWRENCE LEE,
FOSTER REUBEN, MARIA LILLIAN
SANCHEZ, ALISON WRIGHT and
CORNELIUS WEEKLEY,
Case No. C-09-4780 EDL
JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
24
Plaintiffs,
25
v.
26
MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST,
MORTIMER R. HOWARD,
27
28
Defendants.
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Plaintiffs, PARK VILLAGE APARTMENT TENANTS ASSOCIATION, et al. (Plaintiffs)
and Defendants, MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST and MORTIMER HOWARD (Defendants), in
the above-entitled action, by and through respective counsel, hereby request that the settlement
conference with Magistrate Judge Beeler, be continued to a date to be determined by the Court’s
availability. In an effort to assist the Court and allow sufficient time to come to a final resolution
on the remaining issues in the case, the parties would prefer to have the settlement conference reset
to a date in August 2012, if possible.
8
The reasons for this continuance request include:
9
1.
10
The parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions and significant progress
11
has been made toward a final stipulated agreement to make the preliminary injunction upheld by
12
the Ninth Circuit on February 24, 2011 permanent.
13
14
15
16
17
2.
This agreement will be a resolution of all issues and will include a dismissal of the
3.
The parties agree that only a few negotiation points remain and feel it would be more
case.
productive at this time to continue settlement negotiations between themselves with the goal of a
final resolution.
18
19
20
Having reviewed the Judge Beeler’s calendar for available dates, the parties agree that the
following dates are acceptable to them:
21
Monday, August 6, 2012
22
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
23
Thursday August 9, 2012
24
25
26
Additionally, Defendants also request that the deadline for filing the answer also be
extended to the day before the reset settlement conference date.
27
28
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
BAY AREA LEGAL AID
Lisa S. Greif
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-1
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
Naomi Young
Robert Capistrano
2
NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT
James R. Grow
Kent Qian
3
4
5
Dated: June 8, 2012
6
/s/ Lisa S. Greif
Lisa S. Greif
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
SWIHART AND ASSOCIATES
Thomas Swihart
9
10
11
Dated: June 8, 2012
/s/ Thomas M. Swihart
Thomas M. Swihart
Attorneys for Defendants
12
13
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
14
"conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.
15
16
Dated: June 8.2012
17
18
By: /s/ Lisa S. Greif
LISA S. GREIF
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-2
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
The Court having read and considered the Parties’ request to continue the settlement
conference and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the request is granted.
6
August 7, 2012 at 10:30 a.m.
The settlement conference will be reschedule to ___________________________ and
7
August 6, 2012
Defendants’ answer will be due on ____________________________.
8
9
The Settlement Conference Order issued on January 24, 2012, ECF No. 84 remains
in affect.
10
11
June 18, 2012
DATED:_______________
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MAGISTRATE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order
-3
Case No. 09-4780 EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?