Paz v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING FACT DISCOVERY 17 DAYS. The parties' stipluation to continue fact discovery in this action from August 2, 2010 to August 19, 2010 is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 29, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2010)

Download PDF
Paz v. City and County of San Francisco et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar #145790 ANDREW M. GSCHWIND, State Bar #231700 Deputy City Attorneys 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3973 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and RONALD M. CHOY Charles Geerheart, Esq. PAOLI & GEERHART, LLP 785 Market Street, Suite 1150 San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: (415) 498-2101 Attorneys for Plaintiff LEOPOLDO PAZ-HERRERA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEOPOLDO PAZ-HERRERA, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; RONALD M. CHOY and DOES 1-30, Defendant. Case No. C09-4795 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FACT DISCOVERY 17 DAYS Plaintiff Leopoldo Paz-Herrera ("Plaintiff") and Defendants City & County of San Francisco and Ronald M. Choy ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to continue fact discovery in this action from August 2, 2010 to August 19, 2010 to accommodate witnesses and allow both parties to complete their discovery. This stipulation is necessary in order to enable plaintiff to conduct a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the City that was timely noticed several weeks ago but delayed through no fault of plaintiff's STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DISCOV. Case No. C09-4795 MMC 1 n:\lit\li2009\100428\00643229.doc Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 counsel, and also to enable plaintiff to receive additional documents from the City. This stipulation is also necessary to allow the City to take a deposition of a Paramedic/EMT that was timely noticed several weeks ago but had to be continued through no fault of defense counsel. The parties have now scheduled the previously-noticed Paramedic/EMT deposition for August 18, 2010 and the previouslynoticed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition for August 19, 2010. Dated: July 28, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS ANDREW M. GSCHWIND Deputy City Attorneys By: /s./ ANDREW M. GSCHWIND Attorneys for Defendants Dated: July 28, 2010 PAOLI & GEERHART, LLP By: /s./1 CHARLES GEERHART Attorneys for Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: Fact discovery is continued to August 19, 2010. Date: July 29, 2010 By: THE HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court Judge Per General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence, consent and authorization of Mr. Geerhart to file this document on his behalf. STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DISCOV. Case No. C09-4795 MMC 1 2 n:\lit\li2009\100428\00643229.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?