Wang v. Asset Acceptance LLC
Filing
146
ORDER setting motion hearing (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)
David C. Parisi (SBN 162248)
1 Suzanne Havens Beckman (SBN 188814)
Azita Moradmand (SBN 260271)
2 PARISI & HAVENS LLP
15233 Valleyheart Drive
3 Sherman Oaks, California 91403
(818) 990-1299 (telephone)
4 (818) 501-7852 (facsimile)
dcparisi@parisihavens.com
5 shavens@parisihavens.com
amoradmand@parisihavens.com
6
Ethan Preston (SBN 263295)
7 PRESTON LAW OFFICES
21001 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 1630-430
8 Phoenix, Arizona 85050
(480) 269-9540 (telephone)
9 (866) 509-1197 (facsimile)
ep@eplaw.us
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff Johnny Wang, on his own
11 behalf and behalf of all others similarly situated,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14 JOHNNY WANG, an individual, on his
own behalf and on behalf of all others
15 similarly situated,
No. 09-04797 SI
16
Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen
17
Plaintiff,
v.
18 ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, and
TRANS UNION, LLC, Delaware limited
19 liability companies, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
Judge Susan Illston
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No. 09-4797 SI
1
Plaintiff Johnny Wang (“Wang”) and Defendants Asset Acceptance, LLC (“Asset”) and
2
Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) hereby stipulate to set a hearing date on Plaintiff’s Motion
3
for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement:
4
WHEREAS,
5
1.
Plaintiff intends to file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action
6
Settlement;
7
2.
The parties agree that the notice period of filing a motion 35 days before a hearing
8
date, set forth in Local Rule 7-2, is not necessary as no opposition will be filed;
9
3.
Plaintiff has consulted with Judge Illston’s clerk and has determined that the next
10
available date on Judge Illston’s calendar is November 16, 2011, at 2 p.m.
11
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and hereby request the Court order that:
12
1.
Plaintiff is not required to give a 35-day notice of her impending Motion for
13
Preliminary Approval;
14
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement will be
15
heard on November 16, 2011, at 2 p.m.;
16
3.
Plaintiff will file her Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
17
on November 3, 2011.
18
19
20
Dated: November 2, 2011
By:
21
22
23
24
25
26
s/ David C. Parisi___________
David C. Parisi
Suzanne Havens Beckman
Azita Moradmand
PARISI & HAVENS LLP
15233 Valleyheart Drive
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
(818) 990-1299 (telephone)
(818) 501-7852 (facsimile)
dcparisi@parisihavens.com
shavens@parisihavens.com
amoradmand@parisihavens.com
Ethan Preston (263295)
PRESTON LAW OFFICES
21001 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 1630-430
Phoenix, Arizona 85050
(480) 269-9540 (telephone)
27
28
Stipulation Regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval 2
No. 09-4797 SI
(866) 509-1197 (facsimile)
ep@eplaw.us
1
2
Attorneys for Plaintiff Johnny Wang, on his
own behalf and behalf of all others similarly
situated
3
4
5
Dated: November 2, 2011
By:
6
7
8
9
10
s/ Stephen J. Newman ________
Stephen J. Newman
Brian Frontino
STROOK & STROOK & LAVAN
2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
310-556-5982 (telephone)
317-407-6482 (facsimile)
snewman@strook.com
bfrontino@stroock.com
Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
11
12
Dated: November 2, 2011
By:
13
14
15
16
17
s/ Tomio Narita
_____
Tomio B. Narita
Jeffrey A. Topor
SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010
San Francisco, California 94104
(415) 283-1000 (telephone)
(415) 352-2625 (facsimile)
tnarita@snllp.com
jtopor@snllp.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Asset Acceptance, LLC
18
19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
20
21 Dated: November 3, 2011
By:
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation Regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval 3
No. 09-4797 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?