Wang v. Asset Acceptance LLC

Filing 60

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL AFTER PLEADINGS ARE FINALIZED re 52 , 53 .(SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHNNY WANG, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, et al., Defendants. / No. C 09-4797 SI ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL AFTER PLEADINGS ARE FINALIZED Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel defendant Asset Acceptance LLC to provide further responses to various discovery requests.1 Asset requests that the Court either deny the motion or continue it until after the pleadings are finalized and the parties know what claims are at issue in the case. The Court agrees with defendant that plaintiff's motion is premature. Prior to reassignment to the undersigned, Judge Conti issued an order dismissing most of plaintiff's claims. On April 29, 2010, plaintiff filed an amended complaint adding new claims and a new party, Trans Union LLC. Asset has moved to dismiss the amended complaint, and a hearing is scheduled on that motion on July 9, 2010. According to Asset, the pending discovery requests relate to claims that have already been dismissed by the Court, and/or claims that are the subject of Asset's most recent motion to dismiss. Under these circumstances, the Court finds that it is more efficient to finalize the pleadings before resolving the parties' discovery disputes. The parties' letter briefs are found at Docket Nos. 52 and 53. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiff's motion to compel without prejudice to renewal after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss the amended complaint. If any claims survive the pending motion to dismiss, the parties are directed to engage in a further meet and confer regarding any discovery disputes prior to bringing the dispute to the Court for resolution. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?