Lima v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 31

ORDER Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 2/18/2010 Imposing Sanctions Against Plaintiff's counsel. Mr. McCarthy shall pay $250 to the Clerk of the Court no later than 3/29/2010. (tehlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OSVALDINA LIMA, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. NO. C09-04798 TEH ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Set Aside 21 Dismissal and for Leave to File Late First Amended Complaint, filed on February 4, 2010. 22 This Court, having granted the motion to dismiss of Defendant Wachovia Mortgage, FSB 23 ("Wachovia") on December 14, 2009, gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint 24 within 45 days. When Plaintiff failed to amend her complaint by that deadline, the Court 25 dismissed this matter with prejudice on February 3, 2010. Plaintiff's counsel, Paul 26 McCarthy, moved to set aside the dismissal the following day. In his attached declaration, 27 Mr. McCarthy attributed his failure to timely file the amended complaint to his obligations 28 on other cases. 1 This is the third time in four months that Mr. McCarthy has defied the deadlines set by 2 this Court and the Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California. First, he filed a 3 motion for preliminary injunction three days after the November 2, 2009 deadline set in this 4 Court's October 21, 2009 order. Second, Plaintiff's opposition to Wachovia's motion to 5 dismiss was filed eight days after the November 23, 2009 deadline imposed by the local 6 rules, and one day after Wachovia was due to file its reply. At that time, the Court ordered 7 Mr. McCarthy to show cause why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for his failure 8 to comply with the local rules and the Court's orders regarding filing dates. The Court 9 discharged the show cause order on December 14, 2009, imposing a tentative $250 sanction 10 should Mr. McCarthy again fail to comply with the rules. Plaintiff's failure to timely file a United States District Court 11 first amended complaint triggers the tentative sanction. For the Northern District of California 12 Therefore, for good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS the imposition of a 13 $250 sanction against Plaintiff's counsel, Mr. Paul McCarthy (California Bar No. 139497), 14 for his repeated defiance of this Court's orders and the local rules. Mr. McCarthy shall pay 15 $250 to the Clerk of the Court no later than Monday, March 29, 2010. By that date, Mr. 16 McCarthy shall also file a declaration stating that he has paid the above sanction, and that he 17 has read and understands this Court's standing orders and the local rules. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: 2/18/10 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?