Seidel v. United States Of America et al

Filing 92

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ordered that plaintiffs' claims be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the order of dismissal shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 1, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8

For the Northern District of California

No. C 09-4875 MMC

THOMAS E. SEIDEL,

10
United States District Court

9

Plaintiff,

11
12
13

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Defendants.

14

/

15
16

19
20

No. C 10-5073 MMC

VICKI SEIDEL,
Plaintiff,

17
18

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Defendants.

21

/
22
No. C 10-5074 MMC

FOUR RIVERS INVESTMENTS, INC.
23
v.
24
25

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,

26
Defendants.
27

/

28
The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the

1
2

above-titled action, and the parties having placed the settlement on the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed without prejudice;

3

provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with

4

proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for

5

the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the

6

action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
Dated: May 1, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2