Seidel v. United States Of America et al

Filing 97

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 1, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 For the Northern District of California No. C 09-4875 MMC THOMAS E. SEIDEL, 10 United States District Court 9 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendants. 14 / 15 16 VICKI SEIDEL, 19 20 No. C 10-5073 MMC Plaintiff, 17 18 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendants. 21 / 22 FOUR RIVERS INVESTMENTS, INC. No. C 10-5074 MMC 23 v. 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 26 Defendants. 27 / 28 Before the Court is plaintiff Thomas E. Seidel’s (“Seidel”) Motion for Leave to File 1 Motion for Reconsideration, filed May 29, 2012, by which Seidel seeks leave to move to set 2 aside the Court’s May 18, 2012 order reinstating the above-titled action to the Court’s 3 calendar and setting a Case Management Conference. Seidel argues that a binding 4 settlement of said action was reached and remains in effect. 5 The Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED, for the 6 reason that the Court, by the subject order, made no ruling as to the continued viability of 7 the parties’ settlement. Rather, the purpose of the Court’s order was to bring the matter 8 before the Court to address the parties’ respective positions as to the status of the 9 settlement. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: June 1, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?