Halali v. United States of America et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 42 EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
*E-Filed 9/27/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)
Chief, Civil Division
MICHAEL T. PYLE (CSBN 172954 )
JAMES A. SCHARF (CSBN 152171)
Assistant United States Attorneys
U.S. Attorney’s Office/Civil Division/San Jose Branch
150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 535-5044
Facsimile: (408) 535-5081
E-mail: james.scharf@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant United States of America
9
10
11
12
ALI R. MOGHADDAMI (CSBN 174548)
Moghaddami & Sadigh
333 East Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 202
Glendale, CA 91207-2099
TEL: (818) 500-4111
FAX: (818) 500-4144
E-mail: amoghi@aol.com
13
17
MICHAEL L. ORAN (CSBN 110970)
Law Office of Michael L. Oran
800 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 624-1177
Facsimile: (213) 624-1161
E-mail: miloran@mloesq.com
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
15
16
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
23
BENHAM HALALI,
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
No. 09-4900 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION
DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
Halali v. USA, Case No. 09-4900 RS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Whereas, the parties have completed all non-expert discovery, in compliance with the Court’s
April 21, 2011, Case Management Scheduling Order, Document 41, (“CMSO”).
Whereas, plaintiff served his expert disclosures on September 16, 2011, in compliance with
the CMSO.
Whereas, defendant will serve its expert disclosures on November 4, 2011, in compliance
with the CMSO.
Whereas, the CMSO provides that expert deposition discovery must be completed by
November 18, 2011.
9
Whereas, a Further Case Management conference is set for November 17, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.
10
Whereas, the parties have scheduled a full-day, private mediation with Charlie Hawkins on
11
November 22, 2011.
12
Whereas, in order to conserve resources, the parties desire to briefly postpone expert
13
deposition discovery and the Further Case Management Conference until after the mediation.
14
Whereas, the requested postponement will not affect any of the other dates imposed by the
15
CMSO, including the February 2, 2012, Pretrial Conference and the February 13, 2012, Trial.
16
Therefore, the parties jointly request the Court to extend expert deposition discovery to
17
December 23, 2011. The parties further request that the Further Case Management Conference
18
be continued to December 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., or to any date thereafter that may be more
19
convenient to the Court.
20
21
Dated: September 23, 2011
22
Respectfully submitted,
23
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
24
25
26
By:
________/S/_________
JAMES A. SCHARF
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC
C09-4900 RS
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL L. ORAN
1
2
By:
3
_______/S/________
MICHAEL L. ORAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered:
5
Expert deposition discovery is extended to December 23, 2011. The Further Case Management
6
Conference is continued to December 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. [or] [____________________].
7
8
9
27
Dated: September __, 2011
_____________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC
C09-4900 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?