Halali v. United States of America et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 42 EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 9/27/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MICHAEL T. PYLE (CSBN 172954 ) JAMES A. SCHARF (CSBN 152171) Assistant United States Attorneys U.S. Attorney’s Office/Civil Division/San Jose Branch 150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5044 Facsimile: (408) 535-5081 E-mail: james.scharf@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendant United States of America 9 10 11 12 ALI R. MOGHADDAMI (CSBN 174548) Moghaddami & Sadigh 333 East Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 202 Glendale, CA 91207-2099 TEL: (818) 500-4111 FAX: (818) 500-4144 E-mail: amoghi@aol.com 13 17 MICHAEL L. ORAN (CSBN 110970) Law Office of Michael L. Oran 800 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 624-1177 Facsimile: (213) 624-1161 E-mail: miloran@mloesq.com 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 15 16 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 23 BENHAM HALALI, 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. 09-4900 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT Halali v. USA, Case No. 09-4900 RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Whereas, the parties have completed all non-expert discovery, in compliance with the Court’s April 21, 2011, Case Management Scheduling Order, Document 41, (“CMSO”). Whereas, plaintiff served his expert disclosures on September 16, 2011, in compliance with the CMSO. Whereas, defendant will serve its expert disclosures on November 4, 2011, in compliance with the CMSO. Whereas, the CMSO provides that expert deposition discovery must be completed by November 18, 2011. 9 Whereas, a Further Case Management conference is set for November 17, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. 10 Whereas, the parties have scheduled a full-day, private mediation with Charlie Hawkins on 11 November 22, 2011. 12 Whereas, in order to conserve resources, the parties desire to briefly postpone expert 13 deposition discovery and the Further Case Management Conference until after the mediation. 14 Whereas, the requested postponement will not affect any of the other dates imposed by the 15 CMSO, including the February 2, 2012, Pretrial Conference and the February 13, 2012, Trial. 16 Therefore, the parties jointly request the Court to extend expert deposition discovery to 17 December 23, 2011. The parties further request that the Further Case Management Conference 18 be continued to December 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., or to any date thereafter that may be more 19 convenient to the Court. 20 21 Dated: September 23, 2011 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 24 25 26 By: ________/S/_________ JAMES A. SCHARF Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC C09-4900 RS LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL L. ORAN 1 2 By: 3 _______/S/________ MICHAEL L. ORAN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered: 5 Expert deposition discovery is extended to December 23, 2011. The Further Case Management 6 Conference is continued to December 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. [or] [____________________]. 7 8 9 27 Dated: September __, 2011 _____________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DEPOSITION DISCOVERY AND FURTHER CMC C09-4900 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?