Castro v. Horel et al
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATED DISMISSAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
CARLOS CASTRO,
C09-4902 WHA
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
STIPULATED DISMISSAL
v.
ROBERT A. HOREL, et al.,
18
Courtroom: 9
Judge:
The Honorable William Alsup
Defendants. Action Filed: October 14, 2009
19
20
Defendants Fischer, McKinney, Mount, Horel, Beeson, and Grannis move for a fourteen-
21
day extension of time, up to and including October 17, 2011, in which to file a stipulated
22
dismissal of this case. The Court has read and considered their motion and the accompanying
23
declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ requested
24
extension of time is GRANTED. The time in which the parties may file a stipulated dismissal of
25
this matter is extended up to and including October 17, 2011.
26
27
28
Dated: _______________
October 3, 2011.
____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
William Alsup
United States District JudgeDISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Stip. Dismissal (C09-4902 WHA)
1
2
SF2010200204
20533011.doc
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Stip. Dismissal (C09-4902 WHA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?