Perry -v- Astrue
Filing
17
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION re 16 Stipulation filed by Michael Eugene Perry. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/19/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Dolly M. Trompeter(CSBN 235784) Attorney At Law 2261 Market Street, No. 185 San Francisco, CA 94114 Telephone: 415 271-8604 Fax: 415 431-0279 Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Eugene Perry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) Michael E. Perry Civil No. 09-09-4908 MEJ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IT
IS
HEREBY
STIPULATED
by
and
between
the
undersigned
attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 60 days in which to file her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion, which was formerly due on April 19, This extension is necessary
25
2010 will now be due on June 18, 2010.
26 27 28
to provide further opportunity for review and analysis of this case. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension.
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated:
_4/18/10
/s/_Dolly M. Trompeter DOLLY M. TROMPETER, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney
Dated:
__4/18/10
By:
/s/ Theophous Reagans___
(as authorized via email on April 14, 2010) THEOPHOUS REAGANS, ESQ. Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
PERSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an additional 60 days in which to file her motion for summary judgment, up to and including June 18, 2010.
Dated:
April 19, 2010 ___________
_________________________ THE HONORABLE MARINA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge, United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?