Perry -v- Astrue
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY re 22 First MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Michael Eugene Perry. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/26/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2010)
Perry -v- Astrue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
MICHAEL E. PERRY v. Plaintiff(s),
No. C 09-04908 MEJ ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Defendant(s). _____________________________________/
On August 17, 2010, Plaintiff electronically filed a motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. #22.) However, Plaintiff has failed to comply with General Order 45 and the Court's Standing Orders by failing to deliver to the Clerk's Office "no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked `Chambers Copy' and . . . clearly marked with the judge's name, case number, and `Chambers Copy-Do Not File.'" See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Case Management Standing Order, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, ¶ 6. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy, with exhibits and appropriate tab dividers if necessary, of the above-referenced documents. ALL CHAMBERS COPIES OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS MUST INCLUDE ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING HEADER CREATED BY THE ECF SYSTEM. IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: August 26, 2010
_______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?