Perry -v- Astrue

Filing 26

ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSE DEADLINE re 24 Proposed Order filed by Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/30/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2010)

Download PDF
Perry -v- Astrue Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8943 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL E. PERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. C-09-04908 MEJ STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's opening brief be extended from September 17, 2010 to September 29, 2010. The defendant inadvertently failed to file the response to plaintiff's opening brief but files the brief simultaneously with this stipulation. Defendant apologizes for any inconvenience caused to the Court by this delay. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 September 30, 2010 Dated: __________________ Dated: September 29, 2010 Dated: September 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Dolly Trompeter (As authorized via telephone on September 29, 2010) DOLLY TROMPETER Attorney for Plaintiff MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney By: /s/ Theophous H. Reagans Special Assistant United States Attorney PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________ MARINA-ELENA JAMES Chief Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?