Perry -v- Astrue

Filing 5

SECOND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/10/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California MICHAEL E. PERRY v. Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-04908 MEJ SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge James for all purposes including trial. In accordance with Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case. However, all parties maintain the right to have their cases assigned to a United States District Judge for disposition. On October 19, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to consent to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge by November 3, 2009. (Dkt. #4.) Plaintiff has failed to comply with this deadline. Accordingly, for the second time, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to inform the Court whether he consents to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy of both the consent and declination forms may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Forms" tab on the left margin, then choose "Civil." The consent/declination form shall be filed by November 18, 2009. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 10, 2009 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?