Perez v. Nguyen et al

Filing 111

ORDER GRANTING 110 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES. Close of Fact Discovery: 11/7/2013. Deadline for Expert Disclosures: 12/6/2013. Close of Expert Discovery: 1/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202) fortman@seyfarth.com Ari Hersher (SBN 260321) ahersher@seyfarth.com Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) mmason@seyfarth.com Courtney K. Bohl (SBN 278812) cbohl@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ 7 8 9 10 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES J. Randall Andrada (SBN 70000) randrada@andradalaw.com Matthew W. Roman (SBN 267717) mroman@andradalaw.com 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 287-4160 Facsimile: (510) 287-4161 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant DUC NGUYEN, M.D. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ, Case No. 09-4939 JSW (KAW) 17 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES 18 vs. 19 20 21 D. NGUYEN, DR. BOWMAN, P. LA DUKE, S.S.A. JONES, B. FRINTZ Action Filed: October 16, 2009 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW 1 The Parties to the above entitled action, Dr. Duc Nguyen (“Defendant”) and John 2 Timothy Perez (“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”), by and through their 3 undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 1. WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the Court ordered that the trial date be continued 5 to April 8, 2014, the last day to hear dispositive motions be continued to January 10, 2014 at 6 9:00 a.m., and the start of jury selection be continued to April 2, 2014 at 8:00 a.m.; 7 2. WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the Court stated that all pre-trial motion dates, 8 discovery deadlines and expert discovery deadlines will be reset in accordance with the new trial 9 date; 10 11 3. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed to stipulate to a the following discovery and expert discovery deadlines in accordance with this new trial date: 12 a. Close of fact discovery: November 7, 2013; 13 b. Deadline for expert disclosures: December 6, 2013; and 14 c. Close of expert discovery: January 17, 2014. 15 NOW THEREFORE, all Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the Court may enter an 16 Order resetting the close of fact discovery to November 7, 2013, deadline for expert disclosures 17 to December 6, 2013 and the close of expert discovery to January 17, 2014. 18 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 20 21 DATED: July 8, 2013 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 22 23 24 25 26 By: __________/s/ Ari Hersher__________ Francis J. Ortman III Ari Hersher Matthew J. Mason Courtney K. Bohl Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW 1 DATED: July 8, 2013 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 2 3 4 5 By: __________/s/ Matthew W. Roman________ J. Randall Andrada Matthew W. Roman Attorneys for Defendant DUC NGUYEN, M.D. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 [Proposed Order] The following discovery deadlines, and expert discovery deadlines will 3 be reset as follows: 4 Close of fact discovery: November 7, 2013 5 Deadline for Expert Disclosures: December 6, 2013 6 Close of Expert Discovery: January 17, 2014 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 July 8, 2013 DATED: ___________________ _________________________________ Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW 15802756v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?