Perez v. Nguyen et al
Filing
111
ORDER GRANTING 110 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES. Close of Fact Discovery: 11/7/2013. Deadline for Expert Disclosures: 12/6/2013. Close of Expert Discovery: 1/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202) fortman@seyfarth.com
Ari Hersher (SBN 260321) ahersher@seyfarth.com
Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) mmason@seyfarth.com
Courtney K. Bohl (SBN 278812) cbohl@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ
7
8
9
10
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
J. Randall Andrada (SBN 70000) randrada@andradalaw.com
Matthew W. Roman (SBN 267717) mroman@andradalaw.com
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 287-4160
Facsimile: (510) 287-4161
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
DUC NGUYEN, M.D.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ,
Case No. 09-4939 JSW (KAW)
17
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
DISCOVERY DATES
18
vs.
19
20
21
D. NGUYEN, DR. BOWMAN, P. LA DUKE,
S.S.A. JONES, B. FRINTZ
Action Filed:
October 16, 2009
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW
1
The Parties to the above entitled action, Dr. Duc Nguyen (“Defendant”) and John
2
Timothy Perez (“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”), by and through their
3
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1.
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the Court ordered that the trial date be continued
5
to April 8, 2014, the last day to hear dispositive motions be continued to January 10, 2014 at
6
9:00 a.m., and the start of jury selection be continued to April 2, 2014 at 8:00 a.m.;
7
2.
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the Court stated that all pre-trial motion dates,
8
discovery deadlines and expert discovery deadlines will be reset in accordance with the new trial
9
date;
10
11
3.
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed to stipulate to a
the following discovery and expert discovery deadlines in accordance with this new trial date:
12
a. Close of fact discovery: November 7, 2013;
13
b. Deadline for expert disclosures: December 6, 2013; and
14
c. Close of expert discovery: January 17, 2014.
15
NOW THEREFORE, all Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the Court may enter an
16
Order resetting the close of fact discovery to November 7, 2013, deadline for expert disclosures
17
to December 6, 2013 and the close of expert discovery to January 17, 2014.
18
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
20
21
DATED: July 8, 2013
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
22
23
24
25
26
By: __________/s/ Ari Hersher__________
Francis J. Ortman III
Ari Hersher
Matthew J. Mason
Courtney K. Bohl
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW
1
DATED: July 8, 2013
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
2
3
4
5
By: __________/s/ Matthew W. Roman________
J. Randall Andrada
Matthew W. Roman
Attorneys for Defendant
DUC NGUYEN, M.D.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
[Proposed Order] The following discovery deadlines, and expert discovery deadlines will
3
be reset as follows:
4
Close of fact discovery: November 7, 2013
5
Deadline for Expert Disclosures: December 6, 2013
6
Close of Expert Discovery: January 17, 2014
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
July 8, 2013
DATED: ___________________
_________________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DATES / CASE NO. 0904939 JSW
15802756v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?