Doherty v. City of Alameda et al

Filing 161

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 8/9/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 JOHN DOHERTY, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 No. C 09-04961 EDL Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE v. CITY OF ALAMEDA AND CITY OF ALAMEDA HOUSING AND BUILDING CODE HEARING AND APPEALS BOARD, Defendants. _______________________________________ CITY OF ALAMEDA, Counterclaimant, vs. JOHN DOHERTY and DOES 1-15, inclusive, Counterclaim-defendants. _______________________________________ 22 23 This case involves a building located at 1617 Central Avenue in Alameda, California. On 24 June 26, 2012, this Court granted summary judgment in Defendant’s favor on Plaintiff’s claim for 25 inverse condemnation. (Dkt. 138). The only claim left in this case is Defendant’s state law 26 counterclaim to enjoin certain conditions on the property that constitute a public nuisance. Plaintiff 27 sold the property in January 2013 and passed away in April 2013. In February 2013, the Court 28 stayed this matter six months so that the new owner of the property could make improvements. (Dkt. 149.) That stay expires on August 19, 2013. The Court has scheduled status conferences since 1 2 the stay was imposed and has granted Defendant continuances. Defendant now seeks to continue the status conference set for August 13, 2013 to October 1, 3 2013. Because the stay expires on August 19, 2013, and because Defendant has not shown good 4 cause for another continuance, Defendant’s request for a continuance is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: August 9, 2013 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Chief Magistrate Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?