AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
168
ORDER Re Extension of Time To Respond to Third Amended Complaint, Waiver of Service, and [Proposed] Order by AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202-624-2500
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
jstokes@crowell.com
Counsel for Plaintffs
AT&T Mobility LLC et al.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
Case No. C 09-4997 SI
18
This Document Relates To:
19
20
21
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 09-4997 SI
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT, WAIVER
OF SERVICE, AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
CASE NO. C 09-4997 SI
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
Whereas, plaintiffs AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., BellSouth
2
Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T
3
DataComm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T plaintiffs”) filed a third
4
amended complaint (“TAC”) in the above-captioned case adding as defendants Samsung SDI Co.
5
Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., and Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. (the “Newly Named
6
Defendants”) on September 9, 2011;
7
8
Whereas, the AT&T plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on
the Newly Named Defendants;
9
10
Whereas, the Newly Named Defendants wish to confirm a date certain for their time to
respond to the TAC; and
11
12
Whereas the parties wish to set a briefing schedule if the Newly Named Defendants elect
to file motions to dismiss the TAC.
13
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
14
undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, the AT&T plaintiffs, on the one hand,
15
and the Newly Named Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:
16
1.
The Newly Named Defendants waive service of the TAC under Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Newly Named
18
Defendants of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the
19
defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.
20
2.
The deadline for the Newly Named Defendants to move to dismiss, answer, or
21
otherwise respond to the TAC will be November 18, 2011.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
-1-
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. C 09-4997 SI
1
2
3.
If the Newly Named Defendants file motions to dismiss the TAC, any such
motions shall be heard on the following schedule:
3
Oppositions to be filed by:
December 14, 2011
4
Replies to be filed by:
December 23, 2011
5
Hearing Date:
January 6, 2012
6
Dated: October 18, 2011
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
/s/ Nathanial J. Wood
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
jstokes@crowell.com
nwood@crowell.com
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202-624-2500
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: 202-580-8822
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: adams@adamsholcomb.com
holcomb@adamsholcomb.com
leonardo@adamsholcomb.com
Counsel for AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T
Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.,
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations,
Inc., AT&T DataComm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company
-2STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. C 09-4997 SI
1
/s/ Eric S. O’Connor
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 434-9100
Facsimile: (415) 434-3947
nscarborough@sheppardmullin.com
tcunningham@sheppardmullin.com
Eric S. O’Connor (SBN 223244)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10112-0015
Telephone: 212-653-8700
Facsimile: 212-653-8701
eoconnor@sheppardmullin.com
Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/s/ Allison A. Davis
Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 276-6500
Facsimile: (415) 276-4880
allisondavis@dwt.com
Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
777 108th Avenue, N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004-5149
Telephone: (425) 646-6125
Facsimile: (425) 646-6199
nickverwolf@dwt.com
Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics
Co., Ltd.
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-3STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. C 09-4997 SI
1
2
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from Eric S. O’Connor and Allison A. Davis.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
10/24
Dated: ________________, 2011
7
8
Susan Illston, United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
DCACTIVE-16334106.1
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-4STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. C 09-4997 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?