AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 203

ORDER Order Extending Plaintiffs' Time to Move to Compel as to Certain Discovery by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Good Guys, Inc., Kmart Corp, AT & T Corp., AT & T Datacomm, Inc., AT & T Mobility LLC, AT & T Operations, Inc., AT & T Services, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Newegg Inc., Old Comp Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Radioshack Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Target (4372) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc,
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Target Corp, et al.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI

18
19

This Document Relates To:

20

Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’
TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS
TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

21
22
23

AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., C 09-4997 SI
Target Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., Case No. CV-04945 SI

24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07
MD-1827 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1

Defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Samsung SDI America, Inc. (“SDI”) and

2

Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”); AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T

3

Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T DataComm,

4

Inc., Southwestern Bell Co., (“AT&T”)1; Target Corp.; Sears Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old

5

Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp.; Newegg Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),

6

stipulate as follows:

7

WHEREAS Plaintiffs served a Joint Set of Interrogatories and a Joint Set of Requests for

8

Production of Documents on SDI and certain other defendants on November 2, 2011 (the

9

“Discovery”);

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS SDI provided Responses and Objections to the Discovery on December 5,
2011;
WHEREAS the parties have begun to meet and confer regarding SDI’s Responses and
Objections to the Discovery, and require additional time to complete the meet and confer process;
WHEREAS SDI may wish to supplement its Responses and Objections to Interrogatories
13, 15, 17, 19, 21 and 23-25 upon completing the meet and confer process;
WHEREAS the current deadline to file motions to compel in the above-captioned cases is

17

December 15, 2011, and SDI has agreed to permit Plaintiffs additional time to move to compel

18

further responses to the Discovery;

19
20
21
22

THEREFORE, SDI and Plaintiffs, by their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and
agree as follows:
The deadline for Plaintiffs to move to compel further response to Interrogatories 13, 15,
17, 19, 21 and 23-25 in the Discovery shall be extended to January 31, 2012.

23
24
25
26
27

1

This stipulation is without prejudice to the Administrative Motion To Modify AT&T’s
Trial Schedule filed on December 8, 2011, or to Defendants’ opposition thereto.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1

Dated: December 15, 2011

2
/s/ Joshua C. Stokes
3
4
5
6
7

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc., AT&T
Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc.,
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell
Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T
DataComm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company, Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and
Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys,
Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1
/s/

Michael W. Scarborough

2
Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

9
10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12/16/
Dated: ________________, 2011

14

_________________________________

15

Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

16
DCACTIVE-16957202.1

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY