AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 204

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL (#4376) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)

Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4376

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Filed12/15/11 Page1 of 5

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc,
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Target Corp, et al.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI

18
19

This Document Relates To:

20

Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’
TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS
TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

21
22
23

AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., C 09-4997 SI
Target Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., Case No. CV-04945 SI

24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07
MD-1827 SI
DCACTIVE-16961571.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
STIPULATION AND

Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4376

Filed12/15/11 Page2 of 5

1

Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America (“AUO”)

2

and Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”); AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T

3

Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T DataComm,

4

Inc., Southwestern Bell Co., (“AT&T”)1; Target Corp.; Sears Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old

5

Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp.; Newegg Inc. (collectively, the “Crowell

6

Plaintiffs”) stipulate as follows:

7

WHEREAS Crowell Plaintiffs served a Joint Set of Interrogatories and Requests for

8

Production of Documents on AUO on November 2, 2011 (the “November 2 Discovery”) and

9

AUO provided Responses and Objections to the November 2 Discovery on December 5, 2011;

10

WHEREAS AUO served a set of Interrogatories and Requests for Admission on Motorola

11

on July 8, 2011 (the “July 8 Discovery”) and Motorola provided Responses and Objections to the

12

July 8 Discovery on August 26, 2011 and Supplemental Responses and Objections on November

13

29, 2011;

14

WHEREAS the parties have begun to meet and confer regarding certain of AUO’s

15

Responses and Objections to the November 2 Discovery, and require additional time to complete

16

the meet and confer process;

17

WHEREAS the parties have begun to meet and confer regarding Motorola’s Supplemental

18

Responses and Objections to the July 9 Discovery, and require additional time to complete the

19

meet and confer process;

20
21
22

WHEREAS AUO may wish to supplement certain of its Responses and Objections to the
November 2 Discovery upon completing the meet and confer process;
WHEREAS AUO may produce additional documents responsive to the November 2

23

Discovery, and does not anticipate its ability to produce any such documents prior to the deadline

24

for filing motions to compel;

25

WHEREAS Motorola may wish to supplement its Supplemental Responses and

26
27

1

This stipulation is without prejudice to the Administrative Motion To Modify AT&T’s
Trial Schedule filed on December 8, 2011, or to Defendants’ opposition thereto.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

DCACTIVE-16961571.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
STIPULATION AND

Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4376

1

Filed12/15/11 Page3 of 5

Objections to the July 8 Discovery upon completing the meet and confer process;

2

WHEREAS the current deadline to file motions to compel in the above-captioned cases is

3

December 15, 2011, and the parties have agreed to extend the deadline to move to compel further

4

responses to the November 2 Discovery and the July 8 Discovery until January 20, 2012;

5
6

THEREFORE, AUO and Crowell Plaintiffs by their respective undersigned counsel,
stipulate and agree as follows:

7

The deadline for Crowell Plaintiffs to move to compel further response to the November 2

8

Discovery, and for AUO to move to compel further response to the July 8 Discovery shall be

9

extended to January 20, 2012.

10

///

11

///

12

///

13

///

14

///

15

///

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

DCACTIVE-16961571.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
STIPULATION AND

Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4376

1

Filed12/15/11 Page4 of 5

Dated: December 15, 2011

2
/s/ Joshua C. Stokes
3
4
5
6
7

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc., AT&T
Mobility, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc.,
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell
Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T
DataComm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company, Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and
Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys,
Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

DCACTIVE-16961571.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
STIPULATION AND

Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4376

Filed12/15/11 Page5 of 5

1
2

7

Christopher A. Nedeau (CA SBN 81297)
[e-mail]
Carl L. Blumenstein (CA SBN 124158)
[e-mail]
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8

By

9

Attorneys for Defendants
AU Optronics Corporation and
AU Optronics Corporation America

3
4
5
6

10

/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau

11
12
13
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
14
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18

12/16
Dated: ________________, 2011

19
20

_________________________________

21

Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-4-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

DCACTIVE-16961571.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PARTIES’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
STIPULATION AND