AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 247

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT LG DISPLAYS COUNTERCLAIMS 5548 (see order for details). Signed by Judge Illston on 4/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012) Modified on 5/1/2012 (tfS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

12
13

[Additional counsel listed on signature pages]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

17

This Document Relates to:

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Alfred H. Siegel, As Trustee of the Circuit
City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. AU
Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No.
10-Cv-05625 SI

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S
COUNTERCLAIMS

AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:09-cv-4997 SI
Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-04572 SI
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. AU
Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No.
11-cv-00058 SI

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Epson
Imaging Devices Corporation, et al., Case No.
10-cv-00117 SI
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU
Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No.
3:11-cv-03763 SI
Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-02495 SI
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-5840 SI
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-02225 SI
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation,
et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04119 SI
SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-05458 SI

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation,
et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517 SI.
State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03619 SI
State of New York v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-711 SI
State of Oregon, ex rel John Kroger, Attorney
General v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:10-cv-4346 SI
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No 3:11-cv-02591 SI
Target Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI

26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03205 SI
Defendants LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. (together, “LG Display”) and
the Direct Action Plaintiffs (“DAPs”) and State Attorneys General (“AGs”) in the above captioned
actions stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, LG Display amended its answers as of right to assert Counterclaims for Declaratory
Relief (the “LG Display Counterclaims”) in Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-03763 SI, Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-02225 SI, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-04119 SI, State of New York v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-711, T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No 3:11-cv02591 SI, on March 21, 2012, and in Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case
No. 3:11-cv-02495 SI, on March 23, 2012;
WHEREAS LG Display moved for leave to amend its Answers and to assert Additional
Defenses and the LG Display Counterclaims in Alfred H. Siegel, As Trustee of the Circuit City Stores,
Inc. Liquidating Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-Cv-05625 SI, Best Buy Co
Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:09-cv-4997 SI, Best Buy Co., Inc.,
et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-04572 SI, Costco Wholesale Corporation v.
AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-00058 SI, Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Epson
Imaging Devices Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-00117 SI, Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-5840 SI, SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 10-cv-05458 SI, State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517 SI,
State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03619 SI, State of Oregon,
ex rel John Kroger, Attorney General v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-4346 SI,
Target Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI, Tracfone Wireless,

25
26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03205 SI, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal

2

Rules of Civil Procedure on March 22, 2012 (hereafter, “LG Display’s Motion to Amend”);

3

WHEREAS the undersigned DAPs and AGs that were served with LG Display’s Motion to

4

Amend are required to file their Oppositions to that Motion on or before April 27, 2012, and LG Display

5

is required to file its Reply(ies) in support of its Motion on or before May 8, 2012;

6

WHEREAS the DAPs and AGs that were served with the LG Display Counterclaims are

7

currently required to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to those counterclaims on or about

8

April 30, 2012;

9

WHEREAS the parties wish to coordinate the schedule for the briefing of LG Display’sMotion

10

to Amend and responses to the LG Display Counterclaims to allow for a more efficient use of the Court

11

and the parties’ time;

12

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

13

undersigned DAPs, AGs, and LG Display, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, as

14

follows:

15

(1)

The time for the undersigned DAPS and AGs that have been served with the LG

16

Display Counterclaims to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the LG Display Counterclaims

17

shall be held in abeyance pending the resolution of LG Display’s Motion to Amend.

18

(2)

The time for the undersigned DAPs and AGs, including without limitation the

19

DAPs and AGs already served with the LG Display Counterclaims, to answer, move against, or

20

otherwise respond to the LG Display Counterclaims shall be extended to and including twenty-eight (28)

21

days after the Court rules on LG Display’s Motion to Amend.

22

(3)

If the DAPs move against the LG Display Counterclaims, they shall file a

23

combined motion to dismiss. Subject to this requirement, each and every DAP reserves the right to file

24

separate motions to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims to address any questions of law or fact not

25

common to all DAPs.

26

-2-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

(4)

If the DAPs and/or AGs move to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims, LG

2

Display shall file its Opposition to such motion twenty-eight (28) days after the DAPs and/or AGs file

3

their respective motions.

4

(5)

The DAPs and/or AGs shall have fourteen (14) days to submit their Replies.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-3-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1
2

SO STIPULATED:

3

Dated: April 26, 2012

4
5

By:

6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Jason C. Rubinstein
David Orozco
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Parker C. Folse III
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Edward A. Friedman
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jason C. Rubinstein
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

25
26

-4-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ William A. Isaacson
William A. Isaacson
E-Mail: [e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Philip J. Iovieno
E-Mail: [e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Counsel for Plaintiffs Office Depot, Inc., Interbond
Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son Long
Island Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of America,
Inc., ABC Appliance, Inc., Electrograph Systems, Inc.
and Electrograph Technologies Corp.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-5-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Jason C. Murray
Jason C. Murray
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Joshua C. Stokes
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jeffrey H. Howard
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jerome A. Murphy
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13

Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc.;AT&T
Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.;
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell
Telephone Company; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T
DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company; Jaco Electronics, Inc., Target Corporation;
Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old
Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-6-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Richard L. Schwartz
Richard L. Schwartz
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Amy E. McFarlane
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Assistant Attorneys General
120 Broadway, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10271
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff State of New York

8
9

By:

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

/s/ David H. Orozco
Allan Diamond
E-Mail: [e-mail]
James D. McCarthy
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jason Fulton
E-Mail: [e-mail]
DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP
909 Fannin, Suite 1500
Houston, Texas 77010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Marc M. Seltzer
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Ryan C. Kirkpatrick
E-Mail: [e-mail]
David H. Orozco
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Steven G. Sklaver
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Counsel for Plaintiff SB Liquidation Trust

26

-7-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ Jonathan Ross
Jonathan Ross
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the
Circuit City Stores Inc. Liquidating Trust

7
8
9

By:

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

/s/ David B. Esau
James Blaker Baldinger
E-Mail: [e-mail]
David B. Esau
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS
CityPlace Tower, Suite 1200
525 Okeechobee Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Robert L. Ciotti
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS
4221 W Boy Scout Boulevard
10th Floor - Corporate Center III
Tampa, FL 33067-5736
Telephone : [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20
21

Counsel for Plaintiffs Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

22
23
24
25
26

-8-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Roman M. Silberfeld
Roman M. Silberfeld
E-Mail: [e-mail]
David Martinez
E-Mail: [e-mail]
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy
Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.;
Best Buy Stores, L.P.; Best Buy.com, LLC; and
Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.

8
9
10
11

By:

16

/s/ David J. Burman
David J. Burman
E-Mail: [e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue
Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17

Counsel for Plaintiffs Costco Wholesale Corporation

12
13
14
15

18
19

By:

20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Nicholas J. Weilhammer
Nicholas J. Weilhammer
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF FLORIDA
Office of the Attorney General State of Florida
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff State of Florida

26

-9-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Anne E. Schneider
Anne E. Schneider
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF MISSOURI
Assistant Attorneys General
Missouri Attorney General Office
P. O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff State of Missouri

8
9

By:

15

/s/ Kevin Wells
Kevin Wells
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Assistant Attorney General
Arkansas Attorney General Office
323 Center Street, Suite 500
Little Rock, AR 72201
Telphone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Arkansas

10
11
12
13
14

17
18

By:

19
20
21
22
23
24

/s/ Mary Elizabeth Lippitt
Mary Elizabeth Lippitt
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Assistant Attorney General
Michigan Attorney General Office
Corporate Oversight Division
525 West Ottawa Street, 6th Floor
Lansing, MI 48933
Telephone: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff State of Michigan

25
26

-10-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Douglas L. Davis
Douglas L. Davis
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Assistant Attorney General
West Virginia Attorney General Office
812 Quarrier St., First Floor
Charleston, WV 25301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff State of West Virginia

8
9

By:

15

/s/ Gwendolyn J. Cooley
Gwendolyn J. Cooley
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Assistant Attorney General
Wisconsin Department of Justice
PO Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707
Telephone: [phone]
Facsmilie: [phone]

16

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Wisconsin

10
11
12
13
14

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-11-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Michael E. Haglund
Michael E. Haglund
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Michael K. Kelley
E-Mail: [e-mail]
HAGLUND KELLEY JONES & WILDER LLP
Special Assistant Attorneys General for the
State of Oregon
200 SW Market Street, Suite 1777
Portland, OR 97201
Tim D. Nord
E-Mail: [e-mail]
STATE OF OREGON
Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General
1162 Court Street, NE
Salem, OR 97301-4096
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Oregon

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-12-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Lee F. Berger
Holly A. House
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Kevin C. McCann
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Sean D. Unger
E-Mail: [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Lee F. Berger
E-Mail: [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

4/30
Dated: _________________, 2012

20
21

______________________________________
The Honorable Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26

-13-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

2688475.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS