AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 258

ORDER Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/25/12 Dismissal of Claims agains Tatung Co., and withdrawing Summary Judgment Motions set for 6/22/12. (Motions terminated: (136 in 3:11-cv-00058-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (187 in 3:10-cv-04945-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (5790 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (2 57 in 3:09-cv-04997-SI) (149 in 3:10-cv-04572-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (342 in 3:09-cv-05840-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (166 in 3:10-cv-04572-SI) L.L.C., Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., (5547 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc. ("Tatung America").. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al.; and Target Corp., et al. [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI 18 19 This Document Relates to: 20 AT&T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., No. 09-cv-4997-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 21 22 23 Motorola Mobility, Inc.v.AU Optronics Corp., et al., No. 09-cv-5840-SI Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., No. 10-cv-4945-SI 24 25 26 Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al. Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-04572-SI Costco Wholesale Corporation v. AU Optronoics Corp., et al., No. 11-cv-00058-SI 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Defendant Tatung Company of America, Inc. (“Tatung America”) and Plaintiffs Motorola 2 Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth 3 Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Co.; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T 4 DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; 5 Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; Newegg Inc.; Costco 6 Wholesale Corporation; Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise 7 Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores L.P.; BestBuy.com, LLC.; and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) 8 stipulate as follows: 9 10 WHEREAS in their operative complaints, Plaintiffs asserted claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as well as other state antitrust and unfair competition laws; 11 WHEREAS Plaintiffs are no longer pursuing these claims against Tatung America; 12 THEREFORE, Tatung America, by its counsel, and Plaintiffs, by the undersigned 13 counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 14 1. Plaintiffs’ claims against Tatung America are hereby dismissed without prejudice. 15 2. Both Plaintiffs and Tatung America are to bear their own costs and fees. 16 3. Tatung America agrees not to seek any fees or costs nor to pursue any sanctions 17 against Plaintiffs and their counsel. 18 4. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other 19 defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -1- MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 5. The summary judgment motion filed by Tatung America against Plaintiffs, noticed 2 for hearing on June 22, 2012, is hereby taken off calendar as moot. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 Dated: May 24, 2012 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW /s/ Joshua C. Stokes Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com nwood@crowell.com Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice) R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice) ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP 1875 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202-580-8822 Facsimile: 202-580-8821 Email: adams@adamsholcomb.com holcomb@adamsholcomb.com leonardo@adamsholcomb.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Company; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. -2- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 /s/ David J. Burman David J. Burman (admitted pro hac vice) Cori G. Moore (admitted pro hac vice) Noah G. Purcell (admitted pro hac vice) Eric J. Weiss (admitted pro hac vice) Nicholas H. Hesterberg (admitted pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 7 8 9 10 Euphemia N. Thomopulos, Cal. Bar No. 262107 EThomopulos@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation 13 14 By: /s/ Roman M. Silberfeld Roman M. Silberfeld _______________ 15 16 17 18 19 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. Roman M. Silberfeld, Bar No. 62783 RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 DMartinez@rkmc.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: 310-552-0130 Facsimile: 310-229-5800 20 21 22 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC; BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.; BEST BUY STORES, L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC.; MAGNOLIA HI-FI, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -3- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 /s/ Joel S. Sanders 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, jsanders@gibsondunn.com RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, rbrass@gibsondunn.com AUSTIN V. SCHWING, SBN 211696, aschwing@gibsondunn.com JOEL WILLARD, SBN 247899, jwillard@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. 11 12 /s/ William S. Farmer 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 WILLIAM S. FARMER (SBN 46694) JACOB P. ALPREN (SBN 235713) ANDREW H. PONTIOUS (SBN 157174) COLLETTE ERICKSON FARMER & O’NEILL LLP 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone (415) 788-4646 Facsimile (415) 788-6929 Attorneys for Defendant TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. In the Motorola and AT&T cases only 20 21 22 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -4- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 3 orders as follows: 4 1. The actions filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; 5 AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Co.; AT&T 6 Operations, Inc.; AT&T DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; Target Corp.; Sears, 7 Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; Newegg 8 Inc.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; Best Buy 9 Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores L.P.; BestBuy.com, LLC.; and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. 10 (“Plaintiffs”) are dismissed without prejudice as against Defendant Tatung Company of America, 11 Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). 12 2. Each of the parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 13 3. Tatung America shall not seek any fees or costs nor to pursue any sanctions 14 15 16 17 18 against Plaintiffs and their counsel. 4. This order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases. 5. The summary judgment motion filed by Tatung America against Plaintiffs, noticed for hearing on June 22, 2012, is hereby taken off calendar as moot. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 5/25 Dated: ________________, 2012 23 24 25 Hon. Susan Y. Illston, United States District Judge DCACTIVE-18458567.1 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -5- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?