AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
258
ORDER Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/25/12 Dismissal of Claims agains Tatung Co., and withdrawing Summary Judgment Motions set for 6/22/12. (Motions terminated: (136 in 3:11-cv-00058-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (187 in 3:10-cv-04945-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (5790 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (2 57 in 3:09-cv-04997-SI) (149 in 3:10-cv-04572-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (342 in 3:09-cv-05840-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc., (166 in 3:10-cv-04572-SI) L.L.C., Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., (5547 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tatung Company of America, Inc. ("Tatung America").. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202-624-2500
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
jstokes@crowell.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc.;
AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al.; and Target Corp., et al.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
18
19
This Document Relates to:
20
AT&T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., No. 09-cv-4997-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’
CLAIMS AGAINST TATUNG
COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
21
22
23
Motorola Mobility, Inc.v.AU Optronics Corp., et
al., No. 09-cv-5840-SI
Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., No.
10-cv-4945-SI
24
25
26
Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp.,
et al. Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-04572-SI
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. AU Optronoics
Corp., et al., No. 11-cv-00058-SI
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MASTER DOCKET NO.
07-M-1827 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
Defendant Tatung Company of America, Inc. (“Tatung America”) and Plaintiffs Motorola
2
Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth
3
Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Co.; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T
4
DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck and Co.;
5
Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; Newegg Inc.; Costco
6
Wholesale Corporation; Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise
7
Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores L.P.; BestBuy.com, LLC.; and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”)
8
stipulate as follows:
9
10
WHEREAS in their operative complaints, Plaintiffs asserted claims under the Sherman
Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as well as other state antitrust and unfair competition laws;
11
WHEREAS Plaintiffs are no longer pursuing these claims against Tatung America;
12
THEREFORE, Tatung America, by its counsel, and Plaintiffs, by the undersigned
13
counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
14
1.
Plaintiffs’ claims against Tatung America are hereby dismissed without prejudice.
15
2.
Both Plaintiffs and Tatung America are to bear their own costs and fees.
16
3.
Tatung America agrees not to seek any fees or costs nor to pursue any sanctions
17
against Plaintiffs and their counsel.
18
4.
This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other
19
defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases.
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-1-
MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
5.
The summary judgment motion filed by Tatung America against Plaintiffs, noticed
2
for hearing on June 22, 2012, is hereby taken off calendar as moot.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
Dated: May 24, 2012
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
/s/ Joshua C. Stokes
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
jstokes@crowell.com
nwood@crowell.com
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202-624-2500
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: 202-580-8822
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: adams@adamsholcomb.com
holcomb@adamsholcomb.com
leonardo@adamsholcomb.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T
Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.;
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell
Telephone Company; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T
DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company; Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and
Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys,
Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc.
-2-
CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
/s/ David J. Burman
David J. Burman (admitted pro hac vice)
Cori G. Moore (admitted pro hac vice)
Noah G. Purcell (admitted pro hac vice)
Eric J. Weiss (admitted pro hac vice)
Nicholas H. Hesterberg (admitted pro hac vice)
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: 206.359.8000
Facsimile:
206.359.9000
7
8
9
10
Euphemia N. Thomopulos, Cal. Bar No. 262107
EThomopulos@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: 415.344.7000
Facsimile:
415.344.7050
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13
14
By:
/s/ Roman M. Silberfeld
Roman M. Silberfeld
_______________
15
16
17
18
19
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
Roman M. Silberfeld, Bar No. 62783
RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com
David Martinez, Bar No. 193183
DMartinez@rkmc.com
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone:
310-552-0130
Facsimile:
310-229-5800
20
21
22
23
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, BEST BUY CO., INC.;
BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC; BEST BUY
ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.; BEST BUY
STORES, L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC.;
MAGNOLIA HI-FI, INC.
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-3-
CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
/s/ Joel S. Sanders
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234,
jsanders@gibsondunn.com
RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301,
rbrass@gibsondunn.com
AUSTIN V. SCHWING, SBN 211696,
aschwing@gibsondunn.com
JOEL WILLARD, SBN 247899,
jwillard@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
11
12
/s/ William S. Farmer
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
WILLIAM S. FARMER (SBN 46694)
JACOB P. ALPREN (SBN 235713)
ANDREW H. PONTIOUS (SBN 157174)
COLLETTE ERICKSON FARMER & O’NEILL LLP
235 Pine Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone (415) 788-4646
Facsimile (415) 788-6929
Attorneys for Defendant
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
In the Motorola and AT&T cases only
20
21
22
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-4-
CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,
3
orders as follows:
4
1.
The actions filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.;
5
AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Co.; AT&T
6
Operations, Inc.; AT&T DataComm, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; Target Corp.; Sears,
7
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; Newegg
8
Inc.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; Best Buy
9
Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores L.P.; BestBuy.com, LLC.; and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.
10
(“Plaintiffs”) are dismissed without prejudice as against Defendant Tatung Company of America,
11
Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
12
2.
Each of the parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
13
3.
Tatung America shall not seek any fees or costs nor to pursue any sanctions
14
15
16
17
18
against Plaintiffs and their counsel.
4.
This order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other
defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases.
5.
The summary judgment motion filed by Tatung America against Plaintiffs, noticed
for hearing on June 22, 2012, is hereby taken off calendar as moot.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
5/25
Dated: ________________, 2012
23
24
25
Hon. Susan Y. Illston, United States District Judge
DCACTIVE-18458567.1
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-5-
CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?