AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 423

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 421 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case, filed by AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Corp., AT&T Operations, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. terminated.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/20/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012) Modified on 12/20/2012 (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 3 4 5 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION 6 This Document Relates To: 7 AT&T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., No. 09-cv-4997-SI 8 Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI MDL No. 1827 [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 10 11 12 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiffs AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, 13 Inc, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc., 14 AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against Defendant CE 15 Business Unit, SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., previously Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., are 16 dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 17 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 18 3. This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other 19 defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dec 20 This ____ day of ______, 2012 23 24 25 Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Court Judge 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW [Proposed] Order Case No. 07-01827 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?