AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 461

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/2/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3
4
5

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

6

This Document Relates To:

7

Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI

AT&T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.,
et al., No. 09-cv-4997-SI

MDL No. 1827
[PROPOSED] ORDER
8
9
10
11
12

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

Claims asserted by Plaintiffs AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services,

13

Inc, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc.,

14

AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against Defendant HannStar

15

Display Corporation are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules

16

of Civil Procedure.

17

2.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

2nd
April
This ____ day of ______, 2014.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

20
21
22

Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Court Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827 SI