Bucheit v. Dennis et al

Filing 153

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FILING AND THE HEARING DATE RE SAME. Motions filed by 12/16/2011 Responses due by 1/13/2012. Replies due by 1/27/2012. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed, AS MODIFIED, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/9/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ROBERT E. CAREY, JR. (SBN 47556) JERRY Y. FONG, ESQ. (SBN 99673) CAREY & CAREY 706 COWPER STREET P.O. BOX 1040 PALO ALTO, CA 94302-1040 650/328-5510 650/853-3632 fax rec@careyandcareylaw.com jf@careyandcareylaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 17 18 19 TONY DENNIS, DEAN DEVLUGT, THE TOWN OF ATHERTON, THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, & ANTHONY KOCKLER. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 09-5000 JCS STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FILING AND THE HEARING DATE RE SAME, WITH PROPOSED ORDER. 20 21 The parties to this action (Plaintiff Jonathan Buckheit, Defendants Town of Atherton, 22 Tony Dennis, Dean DeVlugt, Anthony Kockler, and County of San Mateo) hereby stipulate 23 to jointly request that the Court modify the existing briefing schedule for the filing of the 24 summary judgment motions (and other dispositive motions) and the hearing date for the 25 same. The request is made because the expert discovery proceeding is extensive and the 26 parties need more time to complete their expert discovery and then to file the necessary 27 dispositive motions, including any summary judgment motions. 28 1 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM 1 Currently, the hearing for the dispositive motions is scheduled on January 20, 2012, 2 at 9:30 a.m., with the Court ordering that all briefings be completed and filed 35 days before 3 January 20, 2012. 4 The parties jointly request that the Court modify the schedule as follows: 5 1. Opening or moving papers- Filed by December 16, 2011. 6 2. Opposition papers- Filed by January 23, 2012. 7 3. Reply papers- Filed by February 6, 2012. 8 4. Hearing date- A date to be chosen by the Court. 9 10 It is so stipulated by the parties to this action. 11 12 DATED: November 3, 2011 /S/ JERRY FONG, for Plaintiff JONATHAN BUCKHEIT DATED: November 3, 2011 /S/ PATRICK CO, for Defendant TOWN ATHERTON 13 14 15 16 17 OF 18 19 DATED: November 3, 2011 /S/ JOSEPH HOWARD, for Defendants TONY DENNIS, DEAN DeVLUGT, & ANTHONY KOCKLER DATED: November 3, 2011 /S/ BRIAN WONG, for Defendant COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 20 21 22 23 24 25 [PROPOSED] ORDER 26 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING 27 HEREIN, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 28 The briefing schedule for the dispositive motions, including any summary judgment 2 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM 1 motions shall be modified in the following manner: 2 1. Opening or moving papers- Filed by December 16, 2011. 13 Filed by January 23, 2012. January 27, 2012. Filed by February 6, 2012. 3 2. Opposition papers- 4 3. Reply papers- 5 The hearing for the motions shall be 6 It is so ordered. February 17 , 2012, at 9:30 a.m./p.m. 7 8 9 DATED: 11/09/11 MAGISTRATE-JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?