Bucheit v. Dennis et al
Filing
153
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FILING AND THE HEARING DATE RE SAME. Motions filed by 12/16/2011 Responses due by 1/13/2012. Replies due by 1/27/2012. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed, AS MODIFIED, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/9/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
ROBERT E. CAREY, JR. (SBN 47556)
JERRY Y. FONG, ESQ. (SBN 99673)
CAREY & CAREY
706 COWPER STREET
P.O. BOX 1040
PALO ALTO, CA 94302-1040
650/328-5510
650/853-3632 fax
rec@careyandcareylaw.com
jf@careyandcareylaw.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
17
18
19
TONY DENNIS, DEAN DEVLUGT,
THE TOWN OF ATHERTON,
THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,
& ANTHONY KOCKLER.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.
CV 09-5000 JCS
STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER
TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR THE SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONS FILING AND
THE HEARING DATE RE SAME,
WITH PROPOSED ORDER.
20
21
The parties to this action (Plaintiff Jonathan Buckheit, Defendants Town of Atherton,
22
Tony Dennis, Dean DeVlugt, Anthony Kockler, and County of San Mateo) hereby stipulate
23
to jointly request that the Court modify the existing briefing schedule for the filing of the
24
summary judgment motions (and other dispositive motions) and the hearing date for the
25
same. The request is made because the expert discovery proceeding is extensive and the
26
parties need more time to complete their expert discovery and then to file the necessary
27
dispositive motions, including any summary judgment motions.
28
1
STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM
1
Currently, the hearing for the dispositive motions is scheduled on January 20, 2012,
2
at 9:30 a.m., with the Court ordering that all briefings be completed and filed 35 days before
3
January 20, 2012.
4
The parties jointly request that the Court modify the schedule as follows:
5
1.
Opening or moving papers-
Filed by December 16, 2011.
6
2.
Opposition papers-
Filed by January 23, 2012.
7
3.
Reply papers-
Filed by February 6, 2012.
8
4.
Hearing date-
A date to be chosen by the Court.
9
10
It is so stipulated by the parties to this action.
11
12
DATED:
November 3, 2011
/S/
JERRY FONG, for Plaintiff
JONATHAN BUCKHEIT
DATED:
November 3, 2011
/S/
PATRICK CO, for Defendant TOWN
ATHERTON
13
14
15
16
17
OF
18
19
DATED:
November 3, 2011
/S/
JOSEPH HOWARD, for Defendants TONY
DENNIS, DEAN DeVLUGT, & ANTHONY
KOCKLER
DATED:
November 3, 2011
/S/
BRIAN WONG, for Defendant COUNTY OF
SAN MATEO
20
21
22
23
24
25
[PROPOSED] ORDER
26
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
27
HEREIN, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
28
The briefing schedule for the dispositive motions, including any summary judgment
2
STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM
1
motions shall be modified in the following manner:
2
1.
Opening or moving papers-
Filed by December 16, 2011.
13
Filed by January 23, 2012.
January 27, 2012.
Filed by February 6, 2012.
3
2.
Opposition papers-
4
3.
Reply papers-
5
The hearing for the motions shall be
6
It is so ordered.
February 17 , 2012, at 9:30
a.m./p.m.
7
8
9
DATED: 11/09/11
MAGISTRATE-JUDGE OF THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR SJM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?