Bucheit v. Dennis et al
Filing
285
ORDER GRANTING re 284 STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND ACTIONS filed by Town of Atherton. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/25/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)
Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906
PATRICK R. CO, ESQ. BAR #: 200160
CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
BEEMAN and SCHELEY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300
San Bruno, CA 94066
(650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
THE TOWN OF ATHERTON
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT,
CASE NO.: CV09-5000 JCS
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
15
TONY DENNIS; DEAN DEVLUGT;
ANTHONY KOCKLER; THE TOWN OF
ATHERTON; THE COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO; and DOES 1-500, inclusive,
16
FURTHER STIPULATION AND
(proposed) ORDER EXTENDING TIME
TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS
Defendants.
14
17
18
The PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby
19
stipulate to the following:
20
21
All Parties stipulate through their counsel that they agree to extend the time for filing all
22
motions, oppositions, pleadings, and actions under Rule 54, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and
23
Local Rules 54-1 and 54-2, Local Rules for the Northern District of California (costs and
24
objections to costs) and FRCP 11, 43 USC § 1988, and Local Rule 54-5 (attorney’s fees) before
25
the Court in the case of Buckheit v. Town of Atherton which are required of any Counsel or Party
26
until the close of business on May 2, 2012. The parties agree to this stipulation so that they may
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS
G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd
Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page2 of 3
1
meet and confer. All parties and Counsel agree that this stipulation shall be binding upon them
2
and may be used in any subsequent proceeding where the extension of time is at issue.
3
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 24, 2012
HOWARD, ROME, MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP
6
7
By:
8
/S/
JOSEPH C. HOWARD
9
10
DATED: April 24, 2012
CAREY & CAREY
11
12
By:
13
/S/
14
15
ROBERT E. CAREY, JR.
DATED: April 24, 2012
CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA,
16
VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY
17
18
19
By:
/S/
20
PATRICK R. CO
21
DATED: April 24, 2012
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,
22
23
COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE
24
25
By:
/S/
26
BRIAN J. WONG, ESQ.
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS
2
G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd
By:
Judge Jo
ER
pero
S
seph C.
A
H
April 25
DATED: ____________, 2012
RT
4
NO
3
FO
2
LI
IT IS SO ORDERED.
N
OF
D IS
HON. JOSEPH T R I C T
C. SPERO
5
6
R NIA
UNIT
ED
1
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page3 of 3
C
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS
3
G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?