Bucheit v. Dennis et al

Filing 285

ORDER GRANTING re 284 STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND ACTIONS filed by Town of Atherton. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/25/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4

JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906
PATRICK R. CO, ESQ. BAR #: 200160
CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
BEEMAN and SCHELEY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300
San Bruno, CA 94066
[phone] [phone] FAX

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
THE TOWN OF ATHERTON

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
JONATHAN B. BUCKHEIT,

CASE NO.: CV09-5000 JCS

11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13

15

TONY DENNIS; DEAN DEVLUGT;
ANTHONY KOCKLER; THE TOWN OF
ATHERTON; THE COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO; and DOES 1-500, inclusive,

16

FURTHER STIPULATION AND
(proposed) ORDER EXTENDING TIME
TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS

Defendants.

14

17
18

The PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby

19

stipulate to the following:

20
21

All Parties stipulate through their counsel that they agree to extend the time for filing all

22

motions, oppositions, pleadings, and actions under Rule 54, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

23

Local Rules 54-1 and 54-2, Local Rules for the Northern District of California (costs and

24

objections to costs) and FRCP 11, 43 USC § 1988, and Local Rule 54-5 (attorney’s fees) before

25

the Court in the case of Buckheit v. Town of Atherton which are required of any Counsel or Party

26
until the close of business on May 2, 2012. The parties agree to this stipulation so that they may
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS

G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd

Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page2 of 3

1

meet and confer. All parties and Counsel agree that this stipulation shall be binding upon them

2

and may be used in any subsequent proceeding where the extension of time is at issue.

3
4
5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 24, 2012

HOWARD, ROME, MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP

6
7
By:

8

/S/
JOSEPH C. HOWARD

9
10

DATED: April 24, 2012

CAREY & CAREY

11
12
By:

13

/S/

14
15

ROBERT E. CAREY, JR.
DATED: April 24, 2012

CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA,

16
VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY

17
18
19

By:

/S/

20

PATRICK R. CO

21
DATED: April 24, 2012

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,

22
23

COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE

24
25

By:

/S/

26
BRIAN J. WONG, ESQ.
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS

2

G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd

By:

Judge Jo

ER

pero

S
seph C.

A

H

April 25
DATED: ____________, 2012

RT

4

NO

3

FO

2

LI

IT IS SO ORDERED.

N

OF
D IS
HON. JOSEPH T R I C T
C. SPERO

5
6

R NIA

UNIT
ED

1

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

Case3:09-cv-05000-JCS Document284 Filed04/24/12 Page3 of 3

C

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FURTHER STIPULATION AND (proposed) ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND
ACTIONS

3

G:\Data\DOCS\0160\04092\MSJ\St
ip & Order Extending Time File
Motions (Costs & Atty Fees)
(042412-Amended).wpd