Littlejohn v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 18

ORDER continuing cmc to 4/2/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY LITTLEJOHN, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipality; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, an agent of the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JOSEPH SALAZAR individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the San Francisco Police Department; RICHARD YICK individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the San Francisco Police Department; ROBERT WALKER individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the San Francisco Police Department; ARTHUR W. MADRID individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the San Francisco Police Department; Defendants. Case No. C09-5021 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hearing Date: Time: Place: Trial Date: March 5, 2010 2:30 P.M. Court Room 10 N/A

25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC; CASE NO. C09-5021 SI

1

n:\lit\li2009\100487\00613765.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On October 21, 2009, plaintiff filed his complaint. On November 10, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. On December 4, 2010, the Court set a case management conference hearing for March 5, 2010. On January 25, 2010, the Court issued an order to show cause why case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On February 26, 2010, counsel of record, Dewitt M. Lacy, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. That motion was set for hearing on March 26, 2010, and subequently moved by the court to April 2, 2010, for hearing. The parties seek to continue the Case Management Conference, presently scheduled for March 5, 2010, until April 2, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. or some date after the hearing on the Motion to Withdraw, as the parties feel it would be appropriate to wait until after the outcome of the Motion to discuss issues of case management. Therefore, THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION HEREBY STIPULATE to continue the Initial Case Management Conference to April 2, 2010 at 2:30 p.m., or some later date at the court's discretion. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES. Dated: March 4, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy SEAN F. CONNOLLY Deputy City Attorney By: s/Sean F. Connolly SEAN F. CONNOLLY Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC; CASE NO. C09-5021 SI

2

n:\lit\li2009\100487\00613765.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: March 4, 2010

LAW OFFICES OF DEWITT M. LACY By: **s/Dewitt M. Lacy DEWITT M. LACY Attorney for Plaintiff LARRY LITTLEJOHN **Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the Initial Case Management Conference is continued to April 2, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. Dated: THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC; CASE NO. C09-5021 SI

3

n:\lit\li2009\100487\00613765.doc