Goodwin v. Potter

Filing 78

ORDER ACCEPTING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE BRIEF, RESETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY, AND RESETTING HEARING DATE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LISA M. GOODWIN,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 09-05080 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

13

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General,

14

ORDER ACCEPTING PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE BRIEF, RESETTING
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT’S
REPLY, AND RESETTING
HEARING DATE

Defendant.

15
16

/
Defendant is moving for summary judgment in this matter. On July 21, 2011, plaintiff,

17

proceeding pro se, was granted a request to extend the deadline to respond to the motion for

18

summary judgement and was ordered to respond by August 11. Plaintiff failed to respond. On

19

August 16, an order to show cause issued that called for plaintiff to respond by September 2,

20

and show cause for her failure to respond to the motion.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff responded in a submission filed on September 1, in which she submitted a
letter explaining her delay and a response to defendant’s summary judgment motion.
This order accepts plaintiff’s response brief and deems it filed. Defendant’s

1

reply deadline is extended to SEPTEMBER 19, 2011. The hearing is continued to OCTOBER 13,

2

2011 AT 8 A.M.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
Dated: September 12, 2011.
7

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2