J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arrizon

Filing 35

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 20, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. ESMERALDA ARRIZON, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 09-05118 WHA Counsel’s request that judicial notice be taken of the parties’ settlement is DENIED. A 17 settlement agreement is not appended to the submission, so the Court has not been “supplied with 18 the necessary information” to take judicial notice. FRE 201(d). Moreover, a settlement is not an 19 adjudicative fact in this case. FRE 201(a). In fact, it seems from plaintiff’s submission that the 20 settlement documents have not even been executed yet. 21 22 The Court acknowledges and thanks plaintiff’s counsel for their notice of settlement, but cautions that all deadlines and dates remain in effect until a dismissal is filed. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 20, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?