Genesis Medical International, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical Inc
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/17/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
TODD A. NOAH (SBN 152328)
DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: (415) 705-6377
Fax: (415) 705-6383
E-mail: tnoah@dergnoah.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaimant
GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL, INC.
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Defendant.
17
18
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
) Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ
1
Plaintiff Genesis Medical Interventional, Inc. and defendant St. Jude Medical, Inc. (“the Parties”)
2
hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be dismissed with prejudice.
3
Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP
5
6
Dated: May 16, 2011
By: /s/ Todd A. Noah
Todd A. Noah
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL, INC.
7
8
9
10
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
11
12
13
Dated: May 16, 2011
By: /s/ Frederick S. Chung
Frederick S. Chung
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
14
15
16
17
18
I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained
from Frederick S. Chung.
19
/s/ Todd A. Noah
20
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
17
Dated: May___, 2011
______________________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James
U.S. Magistrate Judge
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?