Genesis Medical International, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical Inc

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/17/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 TODD A. NOAH (SBN 152328) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: (415) 705-6377 Fax: (415) 705-6383 E-mail: tnoah@dergnoah.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaimant GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL, INC. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. Defendant. 17 18 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ) Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ 1 Plaintiff Genesis Medical Interventional, Inc. and defendant St. Jude Medical, Inc. (“the Parties”) 2 hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be dismissed with prejudice. 3 Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 5 6 Dated: May 16, 2011 By: /s/ Todd A. Noah Todd A. Noah Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GENESIS MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL, INC. 7 8 9 10 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 11 12 13 Dated: May 16, 2011 By: /s/ Frederick S. Chung Frederick S. Chung Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Frederick S. Chung. 19 /s/ Todd A. Noah 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 17 Dated: May___, 2011 ______________________________________ Hon. Maria-Elena James U.S. Magistrate Judge 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 09-5123 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?