Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Matt Lockwood et al

Filing 44

ORDER rescheduling dates re 43 Stipulation filed by Matt Lockwood, Discount Mountain, Inc. Jury Trial set for 4/4/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Pretrial Conference set for 3/22/2011 02:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/10/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)

Download PDF
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Matt Lockwood et al Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW CURTIS R. TINGLEY (SBN 112322) ctingley@tingleyllp.com BRUCE C. PIONTKOWSKI (SBN 152202) bpiontkowski@tingleyllp.com JONATHAN A. McMAHON (SBN 239370) jmcmahon@tingleyllp.com TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP 10 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 430 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 283-7000 Facsimile: (408) 283-7010 Attorneys for Defendants MATT LOCKWOOD, an individual, and dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com; DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. MATT LOCKWOOD, an individual and dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com; DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB STIPULATION POSTPONING AND RESCHEDULING DATES; ORDER Counsel for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and Defendants MATT LOCKWOOD, dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com, and DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC., hereby STIPULATE as follows: WHEREAS, at the Further Case Management Conference on July 23, 2010, this Court set a trial date of January 24, 2011; WHEREAS, the parties have diligently engaged in discovery during the duration of this case; WHEREAS, Defendants have tendered the defense to their insurance carrier and it is the 88B1B259.doc STIPULATION CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW understanding of counsel from coverage counsel that it is imminent that the insurance carrier is going to agree to accept the defense of this case; WHEREAS, the parties agree that it will take the insurance carrier between 30 and 60 days to make a determination regarding its position regarding a settlement contribution; WHEREAS, by agreement of counsel, fact discovery is set to close on October 15, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties believe that a brief extension of the fact discovery deadline for 60 days to December 15, 2010, would allow the parties to negotiate a settlement, participate in a mediation and avoid the costs of numerous depositions; WHEREAS, the parties believe that, with the brief extension of the discovery deadline, it makes sense to briefly postpone the trial date 60 days to the end of March 2011. THEREFORE, the parties hereto, through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. of April 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: September 10, 2010 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP That the fact discovery deadline is extended to December 15, 2010; That the expert disclosure date is set for January 3, 2011; That the Pre-Trial Conference is continued to February 2011; and That the trial date be continued 60 days to the end of March 2011 or the beginning By: /s/ Bruce Piontkowski BRUCE C. PIONTKOWSKI Attorneys for Defendants Dated: September 10, 2010 J. ANDREW COOMBS, A.P.C. By: /s/ Annie Wang J. ANDREW COOMBS ANNIE S. WANG Attorneys for Plaintiff 88B1B259.doc -2- STIPULATION CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW ORDER Based upon the forgoing, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 3. 4. The fact discovery deadline is extended to December 15, 2010; That the expert disclosure date is set for January 3, 2011; That the pretrial conference date is set for March 22, 2011, at 2:30 p.m.; That the trial date is set for April 04, 2011, at 8:30 p.m. UNIT ED S DATED: September 10, 2010 S DISTRICT TE C _________________________________________ TA U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ER N F D IS T IC T O R 88B1B259.doc -3- STIPULATION CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB A C LI FO J arles R udge Ch . Breyer R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?