Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Matt Lockwood et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER Postponing and Rescheduling Motion Hearing date previously set on 12/23/2010 11:00 AM TO 1/13/2011 11:00 AM re 33 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated, 30 MOTION to Quash Subpoena on Wells Fargo/Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Matt Lockwood, Discount Mountain, Inc., 32 MOTION to Compel filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. 57 Stipulation filed by Matt Lockwood, Discount Mountain, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/22/2010. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010)

Download PDF
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Matt Lockwood et al Doc. 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW CURTIS R. TINGLEY (SBN 112322) ctingley@tingleyllp.com BRUCE C. PIONTKOWSKI (SBN 152202) bpiontkowski@tingleyllp.com JONATHAN A. McMAHON (SBN 239370) jmcmahon@tingleyllp.com TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP 10 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 430 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 283-7000 Facsimile: (408) 283-7010 Attorneys for Defendants MATT LOCKWOOD, an individual, and dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com; DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. MATT LOCKWOOD, an individual and dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com; DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB (DMR) STIPULATION POSTPONING AND RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE; ORDER Counsel for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and Defendants MATT LOCKWOOD, dba www.discountmountainsoftware.com, and DISCOUNT MOUNTAIN, INC., hereby STIPULATE as follows: WHEREAS, currently, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Motion for Attorney's Fees are set to be heard on December 23, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. WHEREAS, currently, Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena on Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., is set to be heard on December 23, 2010, at 11:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, though the motions have been fully briefed, and no further briefing is 4EEC4633.doc STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW required, the parties desire more time to resolve these disputes and attempt to resolve the case; WHEREAS, the parties agreed to continue the date of the hearings to January 6, 2011, but have been informed by the Court that the Court's calendar is full on January 6, 2011, and that the hearings should instead be conducted at 11:00 a.m. on January 13, 2011. THEREFORE, the parties hereto, through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. That the hearings on all three motions be postponed to 11:00 a.m. on January 13, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: December 21, 2010 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP By: /s/ Jonathan McMahon BRUCE C. PIONTKOWSKI JONATHAN A. MCMAHON Attorneys for Defendants Dated: December 21, 2010 J. ANDREW COOMBS, A.P.C. By: /s/ Annie Wang J. ANDREW COOMBS ANNIE S. WANG Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER Based upon the forgoing, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 11:00 a.m.; 3. Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena on Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is postponed Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is postponed to January 13, 2011, at 11:00 a.m.; Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees is postponed to January 13, 2011, at to January 13, 2011, at 11:00 a.m.; 4. 4EEC4633.doc The hearings currently set for December 23, 2010, at 11:00 a.m., are hereby -2STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ______Dec. 22, 2010_____ _________________________________________ U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4EEC4633.doc -3- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. C09-05165 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?