Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc. et al

Filing 101

ORDER re amendment to joint case management conference statement re 100 Stipulation filed by Stephanie Enyart. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/14/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)

Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners et al

Doc. 101

DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES LAURENCE W. PARADIS (122336) ([e-mail] ) ANNA LEVINE (227881) ([e-mail] ) KARLA GILBRIDE (264118) ([e-mail] ) 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 [phone] Telephone: Facsimile: [phone] LABARRE LAW OFFICES, P.C. SCOTT C. LABARRE (pro hac vice) 1660 S. Albion Street, Ste 918 Denver, CO 80222 Telephone: [phone] [phone] Facsimile: [e-mail] Email: BROWN, GOLDSTEIN & LEVY, LLP DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice) [e-mail] MEGHAN SIDU (pro hac vice) [e-mail] 120 E. Baltimore St., Suite 1700 Baltimore, MD 21202 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff STEPHANIE ENYART COOLEY LLP GREGORY C. TENHOFF (154553) ([e-mail] ) WENDY J. BRENNER (198608) ([e-mail] ) LAURA A. TERLOUW (260708) ([e-mail] ) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto; CA 94306-2155 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. ROBERT A. BURGOYNE ([e-mail] ) (pro hac vice) 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS 1
884464 v5/HN JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMEND. TO CASE MGMT. CONF. STMT. & IPROPOSEDI ORDER, CASE No. C-09-05191 CRS

Dockets.Justia.com

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
84464 v5/HN JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMEND. TO CASE M GMT. CONF. STMT. & IPROPOSEDIORDER, C ASE NO. C09-CV-05191

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHANIE ENYART, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS, INC., Defendant.

Case No. C09-05191-CRB JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMENDMENT TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JUDGE: HON. CHARLES

R. BREYER

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On May 20, 2010, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, submitted a

Joint Case Management Conference Statement which, among other things, provided for a proposed discovery cut-off date for the completion of non-expert discovery of November 5, 2010. It does not appear from the Court's docket that the Court subsequently ordered that all non-expert discovery be completed by that date. 2. In the meantime, appeals are currently pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of

Appeals from this Court's two previous preliminary injunction orders. The appeals have been consolidated and have been fully briefed, and the Parties are awaiting a date for oral argument before the Ninth Circuit, which is expected shortly.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

In light of the appeals, the Parties jointly seek additional time to complete non-

expert discovery. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to extend the non-expert discovery cut-off date from November 5, 2010, to February 4, 2011 (which is currently the stipulated discovery cut-off date for expert discovery). The Parties further stipulate to extend the deadline for expert witness disclosures from December 3, 2010 to January 10, 2011, and to extend the deadline for rebuttal expert witness disclosures from January 7, 2011 to January 24, 2011. The remaining dates set forth in the Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall remain unaffected by this Stipulation (without waiver of either Party's right to seek modification by way of noticed motion of any pending Court date, including the trial date). 4. The Parties also agree that, absent further agreement by the Parties, Defendant

NCBE will respond to Plaintiff's previously-served First Request for Production of Documents, and First Set of Interrogatories, on or before November 10, 2010. II

3
884464 v5/HN

JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMEND. TO CASE MGMT. CONF. STMT. & [PROPOSEDIORDER, CASE NO. C09-CV-05191

IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: October /2, 2010 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES LAURENCE W. PARADIS (122336) CARL GILBRIDE 2 18) z"/LAURENCE . PARADIS (122336) Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: October 1'2; 2010

COOLEY LLP GREGORY C. TENHOFF (154553) WENDY J. BRENNER (198608) LAURA A. TERLOUW (260708)

WENDY J. BRE Attorneys for NCB

(198608)

4
884464 v5/HN

JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMEND. TO CASE MGMT. CONF. STMT. & IPROPOSEDJORDER, CASE NO. C09-CV-05191

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

CHARLES R. BREYER, JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ORDERED
reyer

UNIT ED

Dated: Oct. 14, 2010

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

5
884464 v5/HN

JOINT STIPULATION RE: AMEND. TO CASE MGMT. CONF. STMT. & (PROPOSEDIORDER, CASE NO. C09-CV-05191

A

C

LI

FO

har Judge C

les R. B

R NIA

O IT IS S

NO

RT

H