Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc. et al
Filing
167
ORDER to enlarge time for filing motion for fees and cost and bill of costs re 166 Stipulation filed by Stephanie Enyart Motions due by 12/5/2011.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document166
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Filed11/11/11 Page1 of 5
LAURENCE W. PARADIS (CA Bar No. 122336)
ANNA LEVINE (CA Bar No. 227881)
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 Center Street, Fourth Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
Telephone: (510) 665-8644
Facsimile:
(510) 665-8511
Email:
general@dralegal.org
SCOTT C. LABARRE (pro hac vice)
LABARRE LAW OFFICES, P.C.
1660 S. Albion Street, Suite 918
Denver, CO 80222
Telephone: (303) 504-5979
Fax:
(303) 757-3640
slabarre@labarrelaw.com
10
14
DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice)
BROWN, GOLDSTEIN & LEVY, LLP
120 E. Baltimore St., Suite 1700
Baltimore, MD 21202
Telephone: (410) 962-1030
Fax:
(410) 385-0869
dfg@browngold.com
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
GREGORY C. TENHOFF (154553)(tenhoffgc@cooley.com)
WENDY J. BRENNER (198608) (brennerwj@cooley.com)
LAURA A. TERLOUW (260708) (lterlouw@cooley.com)
COOLEY LLP
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 857-0663
ROBERT A. BURGOYNE (pro hac vice)
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: (202) 662-0200
Facsimile: (202) 662-4643
(rburgoyne@fulbright.com)
26
Attorneys for Defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners
27
28
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document166
Filed11/11/11 Page2 of 5
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL
3
4
STEPHANIE ENYART
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR
EXAMINERS, INC.,
8
9
10
11
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE
TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND
BILL OF COSTS.
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document166
1
I.
Filed11/11/11 Page3 of 5
Action Requested
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and Civil L.R. 7-12 plaintiff Stephanie Enyart and
2
3
defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners (“NCBE”) (hereinafter, “the parties”),
4
jointly stipulate and request an order extending by 30 days the filing deadline for
5
Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys fees and costs and bill of costs, to December 4, 2011.
6
II.
Stipulation Regarding Requested Action
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between and among the parties, by and through
8
their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, which plaintiff
9
and defendant jointly request, as follows:
10
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2011, this Court entered final judgment for Plaintiff;
11
WHEREAS, to advance judicial economy and an expeditious resolution to the
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
litigation, the parties wish to explore the resolution of Plaintiff’s claim for attorneys’ fees
13
and costs through settlement;
14
WHEREAS, the parties agree that they will be unable to complete a good faith
15
negotiation regarding Plaintiff’s claim for attorneys’ fees and costs within the fourteen-
16
day period provided by Civil L.R. 54-5(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 54(d)(2)(b);
WHEREAS, the parties have not previously requested or received any time
17
18
modifications for the motion for attorneys fees and costs; and
WHEREAS, the proposed time extension will at most delay resolution of the
19
20
attorneys' fees component of this case by only 16 days, but may expedite the resolution
21
of the case by clarifying and narrowing any remaining terms of disagreement following
22
negotiation, or by obviating the need for motion practice entirely.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE FILING DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
FEES AND COSTS.
1
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document166
Filed11/11/11 Page4 of 5
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
1
1. The period during which the Plaintiff must file any motion for attorney’s fees
2
3
and costs and bill of costs shall be extended from within 14 days of entry of judgment by
4
the Court, to within 30 days of entry of judgment by the Court. The new deadline for
5
Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and bill of costs shall be December 5, 2011 (the first
6
court day following the extension).
7
Respectfully Submitted,
8
9
Dated:
November 11, 2011
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
By:
11
LABARRE LAW OFFICES, P.C.
12
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
10
/s/ Laurence Paradis
By:
13
BROWN, GOLDSTEIN AND LEVY, PLLC
14
By:
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Scott Labarre
/s/ Daniel F. Goldstein
16
COOLEY LLP
17
By:
/s/ Gregory C. Tenhoff
18
Attorneys for Defendant
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE FILING DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
FEES AND COSTS.
2
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document166
Filed11/11/11 Page5 of 5
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
3
11
ER
R NIA
FO
harle
Judge C
H
10
RT
9
yer
s R. Bre
NO
8
LI
7
________________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
ERED
United States District Judge,
O ORD
IT IS S
Northern District of California
UNIT
ED
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
5
S
4
A
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE FILING DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
FEES AND COSTS.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?