Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc. et al
Filing
191
ORDER modify briefing schedule re 189 Stipulation, filed by Stephanie Enyart re 169 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 1/6/2012. Replies due by 1/20/2012. Motion Hearing set for 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/9/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2011)
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Filed12/07/11 Page1 of 5
LAURENCE W. PARADIS (CA Bar No. 122336)
ANNA LEVINE (CA Bar No. 227881)
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 Center Street, Fourth Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
Telephone: (510) 665-8644
Facsimile:
(510) 665-8511
Email:
general@dralegal.org
SCOTT C. LABARRE (pro hac vice)
LABARRE LAW OFFICES, P.C.
1660 S. Albion Street, Suite 918
Denver, CO 80222
Telephone: (303) 504-5979
Fax:
(303) 757-3640
slabarre@labarrelaw.com
DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice)
BROWN, GOLDSTEIN & LEVY, LLP
120 E. Baltimore St., Suite 1700
Baltimore, MD 21202
Telephone: (410) 962-1030
Fax:
(410) 385-0869
dfg@browngold.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GREGORY C. TENHOFF (154553)(tenhoffgc@cooley.com)
WENDY J. BRENNER (198608) (brennerwj@cooley.com)
LAURA A. TERLOUW (260708) (lterlouw@cooley.com)
COOLEY LLP
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 857-0663
25
ROBERT A. BURGOYNE (pro hac vice)
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: (202) 662-0200
Facsimile: (202) 662-4643
(rburgoyne@fulbright.com)
26
Attorneys for Defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners
22
23
24
27
28
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189
Filed12/07/11 Page2 of 5
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
STEPHANIE ENYART
Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
v.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR
EXAMINERS, INC.,
8
9
10
11
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
STIPULATED REQUEST TO: 1) MODIFY
BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND COSTS; AND 2) ENLARGE TIME
FOR COMPLETING FILING OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FEES AND
COSTS AND BILL OF COSTS
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BRYER
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189
1
I.
Filed12/07/11 Page3 of 5
Action Requested
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and Civil L.R. 7-12, plaintiff Stephanie Enyart and
2
3
defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners (“NCBE”) (hereinafter, “the parties”),
4
jointly stipulate and request an order: 1) modifying the briefing and hearing schedule on
5
Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs; and 2) enlarging, by one day, the time for Plaintiff
6
to complete her filing of her Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs and Bill of Costs.
7
II.
Stipulation Regarding Requested Action
8
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between and among the parties, by and through
9
their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, which plaintiff
10
and defendant jointly request, as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2011, this Court entered final judgment for Plaintiff;
12
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiff was required to file her Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and
13
Costs and Bill of Costs on December 5, 2011, but due to technical difficulties, Plaintiff
14
did not complete her filing until after midnight on December 5, 2011;
15
16
17
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s filings included certain errors that Plaintiff wishes to
correct;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to complete
18
the filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs to December
19
6, 2011;
20
21
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to file the amended documents listed below to
correct errors found in the original filings.
WHEREAS, under the current briefing schedule, Defendant’s opposition to
23
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs would be due to the Court
24
by December 19, 2011, and Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s opposition would be due to
25
the Court by December 26, 2011;
26
27
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a modified briefing schedule to account
for the upcoming holidays;
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR
COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
1
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189
Filed12/07/11 Page4 of 5
WHEREAS, this Court has previously granted a single stipulated request by the
1
2
parties to enlarge time for filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Fees and Costs and
3
Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs to 30 days from final entry of judgment;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
4
1. The time for Plaintiff to complete the filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys
5
6
Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs be extended by one day to Tuesday
7
December 6, 2011.
2. Plaintiff be permitted to file the following amended pleadings to correct errors
8
9
in her original filings:
10
•
[Amended] BILL OF COSTS
11
•
[Amended] DECLARATION OF ANNA LEVINE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
BILL OF COSTS, with supporting exhibits incorporating an [Amended] Exhibit B
•
[Amended] PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS; MEMORANDUM OF
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
•
[Amended] DECLARATION OF LAURENCE PARADIS IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS,
with supporting exhibits incorporating an amended Exhibit J
•
[Amended] DECLARATION OF DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS,
with supporting exhibits incorporating an [Amended] Exhibit B
•
[Amended] DECLARATION OF SCOTT C. LABARRE IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS.
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3. Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs will be due no later than January 6, 2012, and Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s
opposition to Plaintiff’s motion will be due no later than January 20, 2012.
4. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs be moved to
February 10, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
26
27
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR
COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
2
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189
Respectfully Submitted,
1
2
Filed12/07/11 Page5 of 5
Dated: December 7, 2011
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
3
By:
/s/ Laurence Paradis
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
COOLEY LLP
6
By:
/s/ Gregory C. Tenhoff
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by
a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
10
/s/
Laurence W. Paradis
11
______
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
19
26
R NIA
FO
S
ER
er
R. Brey
H
25
RT
24
harles
Judge C
NO
23
LI
22
________________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
DERED
United States District Judge,
SO OR
IT IS
Northern District of California
A
21
December 9, 2011
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204
(510) 665-8644
12
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
27
28
Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB
STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR
COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?