Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc. et al

Filing 191

ORDER modify briefing schedule re 189 Stipulation, filed by Stephanie Enyart re 169 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 1/6/2012. Replies due by 1/20/2012. Motion Hearing set for 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/9/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Filed12/07/11 Page1 of 5 LAURENCE W. PARADIS (CA Bar No. 122336) ANNA LEVINE (CA Bar No. 227881) DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 Center Street, Fourth Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 665-8644 Facsimile: (510) 665-8511 Email: general@dralegal.org SCOTT C. LABARRE (pro hac vice) LABARRE LAW OFFICES, P.C. 1660 S. Albion Street, Suite 918 Denver, CO 80222 Telephone: (303) 504-5979 Fax: (303) 757-3640 slabarre@labarrelaw.com DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice) BROWN, GOLDSTEIN & LEVY, LLP 120 E. Baltimore St., Suite 1700 Baltimore, MD 21202 Telephone: (410) 962-1030 Fax: (410) 385-0869 dfg@browngold.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GREGORY C. TENHOFF (154553)(tenhoffgc@cooley.com) WENDY J. BRENNER (198608) (brennerwj@cooley.com) LAURA A. TERLOUW (260708) (lterlouw@cooley.com) COOLEY LLP Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 25 ROBERT A. BURGOYNE (pro hac vice) FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 662-0200 Facsimile: (202) 662-4643 (rburgoyne@fulbright.com) 26 Attorneys for Defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners 22 23 24 27 28 Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189 Filed12/07/11 Page2 of 5 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 STEPHANIE ENYART Case No.: C09-05191 CRB 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS, INC., 8 9 10 11 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. STIPULATED REQUEST TO: 1) MODIFY BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS; AND 2) ENLARGE TIME FOR COMPLETING FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND BILL OF COSTS HONORABLE CHARLES R. BRYER Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189 1 I. Filed12/07/11 Page3 of 5 Action Requested Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and Civil L.R. 7-12, plaintiff Stephanie Enyart and 2 3 defendant National Conference of Bar Examiners (“NCBE”) (hereinafter, “the parties”), 4 jointly stipulate and request an order: 1) modifying the briefing and hearing schedule on 5 Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs; and 2) enlarging, by one day, the time for Plaintiff 6 to complete her filing of her Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs and Bill of Costs. 7 II. Stipulation Regarding Requested Action 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between and among the parties, by and through 9 their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, which plaintiff 10 and defendant jointly request, as follows: WHEREAS, on November 4, 2011, this Court entered final judgment for Plaintiff; 12 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiff was required to file her Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and 13 Costs and Bill of Costs on December 5, 2011, but due to technical difficulties, Plaintiff 14 did not complete her filing until after midnight on December 5, 2011; 15 16 17 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s filings included certain errors that Plaintiff wishes to correct; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to complete 18 the filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs to December 19 6, 2011; 20 21 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to file the amended documents listed below to correct errors found in the original filings. WHEREAS, under the current briefing schedule, Defendant’s opposition to 23 Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs would be due to the Court 24 by December 19, 2011, and Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s opposition would be due to 25 the Court by December 26, 2011; 26 27 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a modified briefing schedule to account for the upcoming holidays; 28 Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS 1 Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189 Filed12/07/11 Page4 of 5 WHEREAS, this Court has previously granted a single stipulated request by the 1 2 parties to enlarge time for filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Fees and Costs and 3 Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs to 30 days from final entry of judgment; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 4 1. The time for Plaintiff to complete the filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys 5 6 Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs be extended by one day to Tuesday 7 December 6, 2011. 2. Plaintiff be permitted to file the following amended pleadings to correct errors 8 9 in her original filings: 10 • [Amended] BILL OF COSTS 11 • [Amended] DECLARATION OF ANNA LEVINE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S BILL OF COSTS, with supporting exhibits incorporating an [Amended] Exhibit B • [Amended] PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT • [Amended] DECLARATION OF LAURENCE PARADIS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, with supporting exhibits incorporating an amended Exhibit J • [Amended] DECLARATION OF DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, with supporting exhibits incorporating an [Amended] Exhibit B • [Amended] DECLARATION OF SCOTT C. LABARRE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS. DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3. Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs will be due no later than January 6, 2012, and Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion will be due no later than January 20, 2012. 4. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs be moved to February 10, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 26 27 28 Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS 2 Case3:09-cv-05191-CRB Document189 Respectfully Submitted, 1 2 Filed12/07/11 Page5 of 5 Dated: December 7, 2011 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 3 By: /s/ Laurence Paradis 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 COOLEY LLP 6 By: /s/ Gregory C. Tenhoff 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 10 /s/ Laurence W. Paradis 11 ______ 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 19 26 R NIA FO S ER er R. Brey H 25 RT 24 harles Judge C NO 23 LI 22 ________________________________ CHARLES R. BREYER DERED United States District Judge, SO OR IT IS Northern District of California A 21 December 9, 2011 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 CENTER STREET, THIRD FLOOR BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 12 N D IS T IC T R OF C 27 28 Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al., Case No.: C09-05191 CRB STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGE TIME FOR COMPLETING FILING OF PL.'S MOT. FOR FEES AND BILL OF COSTS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?