Vicari v. Astrue

Filing 29

ORDER Extending Deadlines Signed by Judge Illston on 5/14/12. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 7 days to respond to Plaintiffs Mot ion for Attorneys Fees. Due to the heavy workload of the prior counsel for Defendant, this case was reassigned to counsel for Defendant Ann L. Maley on May 4, 2012. Ms. Maley was out of the office at the time of the reassignment and returned on May 8, 2012. Accordingly, counsel for Defendant needs a brief extension to draft the opposition. With the seven-day extension, Defendants response will be due May 17, 2012. The parties request that all other deadlines be adjusted accordingly. (tfS, COURT STAFF).

1

8

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
ANN L. MALEY, CSBN 176877
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Defendant

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

MICHAEL J. VICARI,
Plaintiff,

)
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-05238-SI
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 7 days to respond to

21 Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. Due to the heavy workload of the prior counsel for
22 Defendant, this case was reassigned to counsel for Defendant Ann L. Maley on May 4, 2012. Ms.
23
24
25
26

Maley was out of the office at the time of the reassignment and returned on May 8, 2012.
Accordingly, counsel for Defendant needs a brief extension to draft the opposition.
With the seven-day extension, Defendant’s response will be due May 17, 2012. The

27 parties request that all other deadlines be adjusted accordingly.
28

Respectfully submitted,
Stip and Proposed Order for Extension for EAJA., 3:09-cv-05238-SI

1
2 Dated: May 8, 2012
3
4
5

MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney

6
7

s/ Harvey Sackett
HARVEY SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
(as authorized via email on 5/8/12)

Date: May 8, 2012

8
9

By s/ Ann L. Maley
ANN L. MALEY
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

10

Attorneys for Defendant

11

ORDER

12
13
14
15

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Date: 5/14/12

_____________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip and Proposed Order for Extension for EAJA., 3:09-cv-05238-SI

1