Prust v. Apple Inc

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Laporte on 6/9/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2010)

Case3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document62

Filed06/09/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS (CA SBN 230038) [e-mail] DANIEL W. BEDELL (CA SBN 254912) [e-mail] THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C. 2200 Geng Road, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MITCHELL PRUST MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) [e-mail] RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MITCHELL PRUST, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL Case No. 3:09-cv-05241-EDL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL Case No: 3:09-cv-05241-EDL

Case3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document62

Filed06/09/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) that: (1) all claims for relief asserted against APPLE INC. by MITCHELL PRUST herein are dismissed with prejudice; (2) all counterclaims for relief against MITCHELL PRUST by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and (3) all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. Dated: June 9, 2010 CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS DANIEL W. BEDELL THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C. By: /s/ Christopher D. Banys CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MITCHELL PRUST Dated: June 9, 2010 MICHAEL A. JACOBS RUDY Y. KIM RICHARD S.J. HUNG MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Rudy Y. Kim RUDY Y. KIM Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant APPLE INC. UPON STIPULATION of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: (1) all claims for relief asserted against APPLE INC. by MITCHELL PRUST herein are dismissed with prejudice; (2) all counterclaims for relief against MITCHELL PRUST by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and (3) all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 9 Dated: ______________, 2010 THE HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL Case No: 3:09-cv-05241-EDL

1