NVIDIA CORPORATION v. RAMBUS, INC.
Filing
43
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 22, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On February 17, 2010, the above-titled action was reassigned to the undersigned. To facilitate the Court's review of the instant matter, the Court hereby DIRECTS the following parties to submit, no later than March 1, 2010, a chambers copy of each of the following documents: 1. Plaintiff shall submit a chambers copy of its Complaint (Doc. 1), its First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7), its opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 17), its opposition to defendant's motion to transfer (Docs. 19-22), and its supplemental opposition to defendant's motion to transfer (Doc. 33). 2. Defendant shall submit a chambers copy of its motion to dismiss (Docs. 11, 12), its motion to transfer (Docs. 13-16), its reply to plaintiff's opposition to its motion to dismiss (Doc. 24), its reply to plaintiff's opposition to the motion to transfer (Doc. 29, its reply to plaintiff's supplemental opposition to the motion to transfer (Doc. 34), and the order v. RAMBUS, INC., Defendant / NVIDIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, No. C-09-5326 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
granting defendant's motion to transfer, if a written order exists (Doc. 35).1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 22, 2010
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
The docket of the instant action appears to reflect that no written order transferring the action was filed. 2
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?