Nork et al v. Designed Cookies, Inc.

Filing 66

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE TO LEE ROBERTS re 63 Stipulation filed by Baker's Bouquet, Lee Roberts, Deborah Nork, Lee Roberts terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/5/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ROBERT ZARCO, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 502138) ALEJANDRO BRITO, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 0098442) HIMANSHU M. PATEL, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 0167233) ZARCO EINHORN SALKOWSKI & BRITO, P.A. (Admitted pro hac vice) 100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 2700 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] ANGEL GOMEZ (State Bar No. 74476) ANDREW SOMMER (State Bar No. 192844) EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. One California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5427 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.398.0955 [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS and BAKER'S BOUQUET

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS and BAKER'S BOUQUET, Plaintiffs, vs. DESIGNED COOKIES, INC., Defendants.

No. CV 09-5336 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF LEE ROBERTS Honorable Charles R. Breyer

-1Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiffs, Deborah Nork, Lee Roberts, and Baker's Bouquet ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Designed Cookies, Inc. ("DCI"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Lee Roberts and all of Lee Roberts' claims against DCI. Plaintiff Lee Roberts shall not seek to recover from DCI the attorneys' fees and costs Mr. Roberts incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to recover from Mr. Roberts the attorneys fees and costs DCI incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to recover from Deborah Nork or Baker's Bouquet the attorneys' fees or costs DCI incurred solely as a result of defending against Mr. Roberts' claim.

Dated: March 31, 2010

ZARCO EINHORN SALKOWSKI & BRITO, P.A. HIMANSHU M. PATEL, ESQ.

By:________/s/ Himanshu M.Patel__________________ Himanshu M. Patel Attorneys for Plaintiffs DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS AND BAKER'S BOUQUET Dated: March 31, 2010 SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP JOEL D. SIEGEL, ESQ.

By:____________/s/ Joel D Siegel _________________ Joel D. Siegel Attorneys for Defendants DESIGNED COOKIES, INC. ATTESTATION CLAUSE I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories and from my clients. By:________/s/ Himanshu M.Patel__________________ Himanshu M. Patel
-2Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
April 5, 2010 Dated: ______________

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff Lee Roberts and all of Lee Roberts' claims against Designed Cookies Inc. ("DCI") are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Lee Roberts shall not seek to recover from DCI the attorneys' fees and costs Mr. Roberts incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to recover from Mr. Roberts the attorneys fees and costs DCI incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to recover from Deborah Nork or Baker's Bouquet the attorneys fees or costs DCI incurred solely as a result of defending against Mr. Roberts' claim. IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

UNIT ED

S DISTRICT TE C _______________________________________________ TA HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

RT U O

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-3Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB

A

C

LI

FO

harle Judge C

s R. Bre

yer

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

NO

RT

H