Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 108

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE FILE SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 28, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 MICHAEL A. KENT, BOYD DAUGHERTY, DANIEL JOHANNING, and JAKUB CMIRAL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, 14 15 16 v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / 17 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE FILE SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED Plaintiffs, 13 No. C 09-05341 WHA On September 20, 2011, Judge Fogel granted final approval of the settlement of this class 19 action, granted class counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees, and entered final judgment. A week 20 later, the case was reassigned to the undersigned judge (Dkt. No. 107). There are no pending 21 motions. It appears that the clerk should close the case file. Any party opposing closure of the 22 file is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the file should not be closed. Responses to this 23 order must be filed by OCTOBER 5, 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, 24 the clerk will be directed to close the file. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: September 28, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?