Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 108

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE FILE SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 28, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

MICHAEL A. KENT, BOYD
DAUGHERTY, DANIEL JOHANNING,
and JAKUB CMIRAL, individually and on
behalf of all those similarly situated,

14
15
16

v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
/

17
18

ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY CASE FILE
SHOULD NOT BE CLOSED

Plaintiffs,

13

No. C 09-05341 WHA

On September 20, 2011, Judge Fogel granted final approval of the settlement of this class

19

action, granted class counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees, and entered final judgment. A week

20

later, the case was reassigned to the undersigned judge (Dkt. No. 107). There are no pending

21

motions. It appears that the clerk should close the case file. Any party opposing closure of the

22

file is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the file should not be closed. Responses to this

23

order must be filed by OCTOBER 5, 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown,

24

the clerk will be directed to close the file.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: September 28, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE