Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company
ORDER CLOSING CASE FILE. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 4, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL A. KENT, BOYD
DAUGHERTY, DANIEL JOHANNING,
and JAKUB CMIRAL, individually and on
behalf of all those similarly situated,
ORDER CLOSING CASE FILE
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
a Delaware corporation,
No. C 09-05341 WHA
On September 20, 2011, Judge Fogel granted final approval of the settlement of this class
action, granted class counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees, and entered final judgment. A week
later, the case was reassigned to the undersigned judge (Dkt. No. 107). There are no pending
motions. The parties were ordered to show cause why the file should not be closed
(Dkt. No. 108). In a joint filing, the parties requested that the file remain open for two reasons:
(1) the appeals period has not yet run; and (2) the settlement program has not yet been
implemented. The parties, however, “do not anticipate” that an appeal will be filed or that
judicial assistance will be needed in implementing the settlement program (Dkt. No. 109). Good
cause has not been shown for keeping the file open. No unresolved issues are pending, and the
parties do not anticipate that additional issues will arise. Accordingly, the Clerk SHALL CLOSE
If additional issues do arise in the future, the file may be re-opened as needed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 4, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?