Modavox, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY. Claim construction discovery to be completed by 3/28/11. File joint claim construction statement by 3/18/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 02/28/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. Doc. 109 Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page1 of 6 1 Thomas J. Scott Jr. (pro hac vice) tscott@goodwinprocter.com 2 Jennifer A. Albert (pro hac vice) jalbert@goodwinprocter.com 3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 901 New York Avenue NW 4 Washington, DC 20001 Tel.: 202.346.4000; Fax: 202.346.4444 5 Erica D. Wilson (161386) 6 ewilson@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 7 Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 8 Tel.: 415.733.6000; Fax: 415.677.9041 9 Gregory S. Bishop (184680) gbishop@goodwinprocter.com 10 Charles F. Koch (256683) ckoch@goodwinprocter.com 11 Rebecca Unruh (267881) runruh@goodwinprocter.com 12 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive 13 Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: 650.752.3100; Fax: 650.853.1038 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-claim 15 Defendant AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 16 [Complete list of counsel on signature page] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY Hon. Joseph C. Spero CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page2 of 6 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, the parties, through their undersigned 2 counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS, THIS ACTION WAS FILED ON November 16, 2009 (Docket No. 1); WHEREAS, this action was reassigned to the Honorable Joseph C. Spero on April 20, 5 2010 (Docket No. 45); 6 WHEREAS, the Court entered a Case Management and Pretrial Order on May 12, 2010 7 ("CMC Order") (Docket No. 50); 8 WHEREAS, the CMC Order required the parties to file a Joint Claim Construction and 9 Pre-hearing Statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 on November 12, 2010; 10 WHEREAS, the CMC Order required the parties to complete Claim Construction 11 Discovery on December 13, 2010; 12 WHEREAS, on October 26, 2010, the Court granted the parties' first stipulated request to 13 extend the date for filing their Joint Claim Construction and Pre-hearing Statement, by three 14 weeks, to December 3, 2010 (Docket No. 67); 15 WHEREAS, on December 3, 2010, the Court granted in part Defendant's Motion to 16 Extend Case Management Schedule so that the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing 17 Statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 shall be due by March 4, 2011, and Claim Construction 18 Discovery shall be completed by March 14, 2011 (Docket No. 85); 19 WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to extend the date for filing the Joint Claim 20 Construction and Pre-Hearing statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 by two weeks, to March 18, 21 2011; 22 WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to extend the date to complete Claim Construction 23 Discovery by two weeks, to March 28, 2011; 24 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that no other scheduled dates in this action will be 25 changed due to this extension; 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page3 of 6 1 THEREFORE, for the reasons set forth more fully in the accompanying declaration of 2 Gregory S. Bishop, the parties request the entry of an order extending (1) the deadline for filing 3 the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3 by two weeks, 4 to March 18, 2011, and (2) the date to complete Claim Construction Discovery by two weeks, to 5 March 28, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page4 of 6 1 Dated: February 25, 2011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Gregory S. Bishop Thomas J. Scott Jr. (pro hac vice) tscott@goodwinprocter.com Jennifer A. Albert (pro hac vice) jalbert@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 901 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Tel.: (202) 346-4000; Fax: (202) 346-4444 Erica D. Wilson (SBN 161386) ewilson@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 3 Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4003 Tel.: (415) 733-6000; Fax: (415) 677-9041 Gregory S. Bishop (SBN 184680) gbishop@goodwinprocter.com Charles F. Koch (SBN 256683) ckoch@goodwinprocter.com Rebecca Unruh (SBN 267881) runruh@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: (650) 752-3100; Fax: (650) 853-1038 David R. Shaub (SBN 032322) Lisbeth Bosshart (SBN 201822) Robert C. Matz (SBN 217822) SHAUB & WILLIAMS LLP 12121 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 205 Los Angeles, CA 90025-1165 Tel: (310) 826-6678; Fax: (310) 826-8042 lawfirm@sw-law.com David G. Rosenbaum (admitted pro hac vice) Ayhan E. Mertogul (admitted pro hac vice) ROSENBAUM & SILVERT, P.C. 1480 Techny Road Northbrook, IL 60062 Tel: (847) 770-6000; Fax: (847) 770-6006 drosenbaum@rosenbaumsilvert.com Attorneys for Plaintiff AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page5 of 6 1 Dated: February 25, 2011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Daniel P. Muino Rachel Krevans (116421) rkrevans@mofo.com Richard S.J. Hung (197425) rhung@mofo.com Daniel P. Muino (209624) dmuino@mofo.com Jian Bin (Ben) Gao (245734) jgao@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street, 32nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Tel.: 415.268.7000 Fax: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff YAHOO! INC. [PROPOSED ORDER] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS A C LI FO 19 Spero JOSEPH ph CSPERO seC. . Judge Jo UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE R NIA 18 UNIT ED 17 Date: S Feb. 28 , 2011 RT U O NO RT H Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document106 Filed02/25/11 Page6 of 6 1 2 3 4 GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION I, Gregory S. Bishop, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY 5 In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Daniel P. Muino has concurred to 6 its filing. 7 Dated: February 25, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY LIBA/2154181.1 Case No. C 09-5386 JCS /s/ Gregory S. Bishop Gregory S. Bishop

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?