Modavox, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER extending time to respond to first amended complaint re 27 Stipulation filed by Yahoo! Inc., Modavox, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/19/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) (rkrevans@mofo.com) RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) (rhung@mofo.com) JIAN BIN (BEN) GAO (CA SBN 245734) (jgao@mofo.com) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO!, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 MODAVOX, INC., 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 YAHOO!, INC., 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C-09-5386 EDL sf-2805589 Case No. C-09-5386 EDL CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, that Defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint filed in the above-captioned matter is hereby extended through and including February 26, 2010. // // // // // 1 1 Dated: February 18, 2010 2 3 By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 14 I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 15 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 16 hereby attest that each signatory to this document has concurred to its filing. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2010 By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung By: /s/ Stephen David Morgan Stephen David Morgan Attorneys for Plaintiff MODAVOX, INC. Dated: February 18, 2010 /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO!, INC. SHAUB & WILLIAMS LLP MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP UNIT ED Dated: _____________________, 2010 February 19 ____________________________________ The Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District RED RDE Judge S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ER CASE NO. C-09-5386 EDL N F sf-2805589 LI FO harles Judge C R. Brey er R NIA 2 IT IS S OO D IS T IC T O R A NO RT H C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?