Modavox, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

Filing 285

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY RE: PRIOR ART ADDED IN YAHOO!'S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO FIRST AMENDED INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/29/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page1 of 6

1 [Complete list of counsel on signature page]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
YAHOO! INC.,
Defendant.

15
16

19
20

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT
DISCOVERY REGARDING PRIOR ART
ADDED IN YAHOO!’S SECOND
SUPPLEMENT TO FIRST AMENDED
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
Judge: Hon. Magistrate Joseph C. Spero

YAHOO! INC.,

17
18

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
WORLD TALK RADIO, LLC,
Counterclaim Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page2 of 6

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, the parties, through their undersigned

2 counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
3

WHEREAS, following the Further Case Management Conference held on January 6, 2012,

4 the Court Ordered that the Discovery cutoff would be March 16, 2012;
5

WHEREAS, a portion of the Court’s March 15, 2012 order enlarging fact discovery

6 (Docket No. 243) stated that discovery deadlines would be modified as follows:
7

Event

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Date

Discovery cutoff for the limited purpose
of completing the depositions set forth
below and any necessary follow-on
discovery on the topics listed.

April 4, 2012

Opening Expert Reports on party with
burden of proof

April 20, 2012

Expert Reports on party with no burden of
proof

May 18, 2012

Expert Discovery Cutoff

June 7, 2012

File Dispositive Motions

June 8, 2012

Opposition to Dispositive Motion

June 22, 2012

Reply to Dispositive Motion

June 29, 2012

WHEREAS, the Court allowed Yahoo! to amend its Invalidity Contentions on April 5,

20 2012 (Docket No. 262);
21

WHEREAS, the Court acknowledged that Yahoo! has agreed to reasonable discovery

22 relating to the art added in Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to First Amended Invalidity Contentions
23 (Docket No. 282);
24

WHEREAS, Augme asserts that it needs to take additional discovery for prior art added in

25 Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to First Amended Invalidity Contentions;
26

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the close of fact discovery to allow Augme

27 to take reasonable third party discovery (including the deposition of Mark Scheele) regarding the
28 art added in Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to First Amended Invalidity Contentions to
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page3 of 6

1 June 29, 2012;
2

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the close of fact discovery to allow Augme

3 to take reasonable discovery on Yahoo! regarding the art added in Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to
4 Amended First Invalidity Contentions to June 20, 2012;
5

WHEREAS, Augme has been unable to schedule Mr. Scheele’s deposition for before

6 June 29, 2012;
7

WHEREAS, Yahoo! has agreed to respond to Augme’s Sixth Set of Interrogatories to

8 Yahoo!, Augme’s Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Yahoo!, and Augme’s
9 Requests for Admission (Set Two) to Yahoo! by June 5, 2012;
10

WHEREAS, Yahoo! reserves the right to object to discovery that is unreasonable or not

11 narrowly tailored;
12

WHEREAS, no other scheduled dates in this action will be changed due to this extension;

13

THEREFORE, based on the parties’ agreement, the parties respectfully request that the

14 Court enter an order:
15



Extending time for Augme to conduct reasonable third party discovery regarding

16

the art added in Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to First Amended Invalidity

17

Contentions to June 29, 2012, for the sole purpose of allowing Augme to fully

18

investigate this newly-added prior art; and

19



Extending time for Augme to conduct reasonable discovery on Yahoo! regarding

20

the art added in Yahoo!’s Second Supplement to First Amended Invalidity

21

Contentions to June 20, 2012, for the sole purpose of allowing Augme to fully

22

investigate this newly-added prior art.

23
24

Dated: May 23, 2012

25

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Daniel W. Richards
Thomas J. Scott Jr. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jennifer A. Albert (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue NW
2

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page4 of 6

Washington, DC 20001
Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

1
2

Erica D. Wilson (SBN 161386)
[e-mail]
Gregory S. Bishop (SBN 184680)
[e-mail]
Charles F. Koch (SBN 256683)
[e-mail]
Rebecca Unruh (SBN 267881)
[e-mail]
Daniel W. Richards (280595)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1105
Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Michael Strapp (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER llp
Exchange Place
53 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
and Counterclaim Defendant WORLD TALK
RADIO, LLC

14
15
16
Dated: May 23, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

17
By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung
Rachel Krevans (116421)
[e-mail]
Richard S.J. Hung (197425)
[e-mail]
Daniel P. Muino (209624)
[e-mail]
J. Ryan Gilfoil (246493)
[e-mail]
John K. Blake, Jr. (262906)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street, 32nd Floor,
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff YAHOO! INC.

27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page5 of 6

1
[PROPOSED ORDER]
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

, 2012

5

. Spero

Joseph C

NO

6

R NIA

May 29

UNIT
ED

Date:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

S

3

8

RN

FO

A

H

7

LI

RT

Judge
JOSEPH C. SPERO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
E

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT DISCOVERY
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05386-JCS Document284 Filed05/24/12 Page6 of 6

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

1
2

I, Daniel W. Richards, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR FACT
DISCOVERY

4
5
6
7

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Richard S.J. Hung has concurred
to its filing.
Dated: May 23, 2012
/s/ Daniel W. Richards
Daniel W. Richards

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
LIBA/2302779.3

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS